The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a restricted intravenous fluid regimen versus a standard regimen on complications after colorectal resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Current fluid administration in major surgery causes a weight increase of 3-6 kg. Complications after colorectal surgery are reported in up to 68% of patients. Associations between postoperative weight gain and poor survival as well as fluid overload and complications have been shown. METHODS: We did a randomized observer-blinded multicenter trial. After informed consent was obtained, 172 patients were allocated to either a restricted or a standard intraoperative and postoperative intravenous fluid regimen. The restricted regimen aimed at maintaining preoperative body weight; the standard regimen resembled everyday practice. The primary outcome measures were complications; the secondary measures were death and adverse effects. RESULTS: The restricted intravenous fluid regimen significantly reduced postoperative complications both by intention-to-treat (33% versus 51%, P = 0.013) and per-protocol (30% versus 56%, P = 0.003) analyses. The numbers of both cardiopulmonary (7% versus 24%, P = 0.007) and tissue-healing complications (16% versus 31%, P = 0.04) were significantly reduced. No patients died in the restricted group compared with 4 deaths in the standard group (0% versus 4.7%, P = 0.12). No harmful adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: The restricted perioperative intravenous fluid regimen aiming at unchanged body weight reduces complications after elective colorectal resection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chowdhury, A. H., Cox, E. F., Francis, S. T., & Lobo, D. N. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318256be72 · Cited by 764
Sutherland, S. M., Zappitelli, M., Alexander, S. R., Chua, A. N., Brophy, P. D., Bunchman, T. E., Hackbarth, R., Somers, M. J. G., Baum, M., Symons, J. M., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.10.048 · Cited by 688
Fluid balance and acute kidney injury
Prowle, J. R., Echeverri, J. E., Ligabo, E. V., Ronco, C., & Bellomo, R. (2010) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2009.213 · Cited by 503
Temple-Oberle, C., Shea-Budgell, M. A., Tan, M., Semple, J. L., Schrag, C., Barreto, M., Blondeel, P., Hamming, J., Dayan, J., & Ljungqvist, O. (2017) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003242 · Cited by 361
Cecconi, M., Corredor, C., Arulkumaran, N., Abuella, G., Ball, J., Grounds, R. M., Hamilton, M., & Rhodes, A. (2012) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc11823 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Brandstrup, B., Tønnesen, H., Beier-Holgersen, R., Hjortsø, E., Ørding, H., Lindorff-Larsen, K., Rasmussen, M. S., Lanng, C., Wallin, L., Iversen, L. H., Gramkow, C. S., Okholm, M., Blemmer, T., Svendsen, P.-E., Rottensten, H. H., Thage, B., Riis, J., Jeppesen, I. S., Teilum, D., Christensen, A. M., Graungaard, B., & Pott, F.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 238
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 641-648
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011751065
- Cited by
- 1,585
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23
- The paper
- Brandstrup, B., Tønnesen, H., Beier-Holgersen, R., Hjortsø, E., Ørding, H., Lindorff-Larsen, K., Rasmussen, M. S., Lanng, C., Wallin, L., Iversen, L. H., Gramkow, C. S., Okholm, M., Blemmer, T., Svendsen, P.-E., Rottensten, H. H., Thage, B., Riis, J., Jeppesen, I. S., Teilum, D., . . . Pott, F. (2003). Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.