Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,585

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial

Open access
Brandstrup, Birgitte, Tønnesen, Hanne, Beier-Holgersen, Randi, Hjortsø, Else, Ørding, Helle, Lindorff-Larsen, Karen, Rasmussen, Morten S., Lanng, Charlotte, Wallin, Lene, Iversen, Lene H., Gramkow, Christina S., Okholm, Mette, Blemmer, Tine, Svendsen, Poul-Erik, Rottensten, Henrik H., Thage, Birgit, Riis, Jens, Jeppesen, Inge S., Teilum, Dorthe, Christensen, Anne Mette, Graungaard, Ben, Pott, Frank·2003·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a restricted intravenous fluid regimen versus a standard regimen on complications after colorectal resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Current fluid administration in major surgery causes a weight increase of 3-6 kg. Complications after colorectal surgery are reported in up to 68% of patients. Associations between postoperative weight gain and poor survival as well as fluid overload and complications have been shown. METHODS: We did a randomized observer-blinded multicenter trial. After informed consent was obtained, 172 patients were allocated to either a restricted or a standard intraoperative and postoperative intravenous fluid regimen. The restricted regimen aimed at maintaining preoperative body weight; the standard regimen resembled everyday practice. The primary outcome measures were complications; the secondary measures were death and adverse effects. RESULTS: The restricted intravenous fluid regimen significantly reduced postoperative complications both by intention-to-treat (33% versus 51%, P = 0.013) and per-protocol (30% versus 56%, P = 0.003) analyses. The numbers of both cardiopulmonary (7% versus 24%, P = 0.007) and tissue-healing complications (16% versus 31%, P = 0.04) were significantly reduced. No patients died in the restricted group compared with 4 deaths in the standard group (0% versus 4.7%, P = 0.12). No harmful adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: The restricted perioperative intravenous fluid regimen aiming at unchanged body weight reduces complications after elective colorectal resection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,585

Metadata

Authors
Brandstrup, B., Tønnesen, H., Beier-Holgersen, R., Hjortsø, E., Ørding, H., Lindorff-Larsen, K., Rasmussen, M. S., Lanng, C., Wallin, L., Iversen, L. H., Gramkow, C. S., Okholm, M., Blemmer, T., Svendsen, P.-E., Rottensten, H. H., Thage, B., Riis, J., Jeppesen, I. S., Teilum, D., Christensen, A. M., Graungaard, B., & Pott, F.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2003-11
Volume
238
Issue
5
Pages
641-648
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011751065
Cited by
1,585
References
0
FWCI
31.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23
The paper
Brandstrup, B., Tønnesen, H., Beier-Holgersen, R., Hjortsø, E., Ørding, H., Lindorff-Larsen, K., Rasmussen, M. S., Lanng, C., Wallin, L., Iversen, L. H., Gramkow, C. S., Okholm, M., Blemmer, T., Svendsen, P.-E., Rottensten, H. H., Thage, B., Riis, J., Jeppesen, I. S., Teilum, D., . . . Pott, F. (2003). Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.