Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Resection Prior to Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Open access
Belghiti, Jacques, Cortes, Alexandre, Abdalla, Eddie K., Régimbeau, Jean-Marc, Prakash, Kurumboor, Durand, François, Sommacale, Daniele, Dondero, Federica, Lesurtel, Mickael, Sauvanet, Alain, Farges, Olivier, Kianmanesh, Reza·2003·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and postoperative course of liver transplantation (LT) in cirrhotic patients who underwent liver resection prior to LT for HCC. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although LT provides longer survival than liver resection for treatment of small HCCs, donor shortage and long LT wait time may argue against LT. The feasibility and survival following LT after hepatic resection have not been previously examined. METHODS: Between 1991 and 2001, among 107 patients who underwent LT for HCC, 88 met Mazzafero's criteria upon pathologic analysis of the explant. Of these, 70 underwent primary liver transplantation (PLT) and 18 liver resection prior to secondary liver transplantation (SLT) for recurrence (n = 11), deterioration of liver function (n = 4), or high risk for recurrence (n = 3). Perioperative and postoperative factors and long-term survival were compared. RESULTS: Comparison of PLT and SLT groups at the time of LT revealed similar median age (53 vs. 55 years), sex, and etiology of liver disease (alcohol/viral B/C/other). In the SLT group, the mean time between liver resection and listing for LT was 20 months (range 1-84 months). Overall time on LT waiting list of the two groups was similar (3 vs. 5 months). Pathologic analysis after LT revealed similar tumor size (2.2 vs. 2.3 cm) and number (1.6 vs. 1.7). Perioperative and postoperative courses were not different in terms of operative time (551 vs. 530 minutes), blood loss (1191 vs. 1282 mL), transfusion (3 vs. 2 units), ICU (9 vs. 10 days) or hospital stay (32 vs. 31 days), morbidity (51% vs. 56%) or 30-day mortality (5.7% vs. 5.6%). During a median follow-up of 32 months (3 to 158 months), 3 patients recurred after PLT and one after SLT. After transplantation, 3- and 5-year overall survivals were not different between groups (82 vs. 82% and 59 vs. 61%). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, liver resection prior to transplantation does not increase the morbidity or impair long-term survival following LT. Therefore, liver resection prior to transplantation can be integrated in the treatment strategy for HCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000098621.74851.65

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Belghiti, J., Cortes, A., Abdalla, E. K., Régimbeau, J.-M., Prakash, K., Durand, F., Sommacale, D., Dondero, F., Lesurtel, M., Sauvanet, A., Farges, O., & Kianmanesh, R.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2003-12
Volume
238
Issue
6
Pages
885-893
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079825305
Cited by
415
References
0
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resection Prior to Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000098621.74851.65
The paper
Belghiti, J., Cortes, A., Abdalla, E. K., Régimbeau, J.-M., Prakash, K., Durand, F., Sommacale, D., Dondero, F., Lesurtel, M., Sauvanet, A., Farges, O., & Kianmanesh, R. (2003). Resection Prior to Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000098621.74851.65

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.