The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Value of Bile Replacement During External Biliary Drainage: An Analysis of Intestinal Permeability, Integrity, and Microflora
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of bile replacement following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, ie, external drainage, on intestinal permeability, integrity, and microflora in a clinical setting. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Several authors have reported that internal biliary drainage is superior to external drainage. However, it is unclear whether bile replacement following external drainage is beneficial. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with biliary cancer underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) as a part of presurgical management. All externally drained bile was replaced either per os or by administration through a nasoduodenal tube. The interval between PTBD and the beginning of bile replacement was 21.3 +/- 19.7 days, and the length of bile replacement was 20.7 +/- 9.6 days. The lactulose-mannitol test, measurement of serum diamine oxidase (DAO) activity, and analyses of fecal microflora and organic acids were performed before and after bile replacement. RESULTS: The volume of externally drained bile varied widely from patient to patient, ranging from 220 +/- 106 mL/d to 1616 +/- 394 mL/d (mean, 714 +/- 346 mL/d). Biliary concentrations of bile acids, cholesterol, and phospholipids increased significantly after bile replacement. The lactulose-mannitol (L/M) ratio decreased from 0.063 +/- 0.060 before bile replacement to 0.038 +/- 0.032 after bile replacement (P < 0.05). Serum DAO activity increased from 3.9 +/- 1.4 U/L before bile replacement to 5.1 +/- 1.6 U/L after bile replacement (P < 0.005), and the magnitude of change in serum DAO activity correlated with the length of bile replacement (r = 0.483, P < 0.05). Neither the L/M ratios nor serum DAO activities before bile replacement correlated with the interval between PTBD and the beginning of bile replacement. Fecal microflora and organic acids were unchanged. CONCLUSION: Impaired intestinal barrier function does not recover by PTBD without bile replacement. Bile replacement during external biliary drainage can restore the intestinal barrier function in patients with biliary obstruction, primarily due to repair of physical damage to the intestinal mucosa. Our results support the hypothesis that bile replacement during external drainage is beneficial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nagino, M., Ebata, T., Yokoyama, Y., Igami, T., Sugawara, G., Takahashi, Y., & Nimura, Y. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182708b57 · Cited by 656
Self-citationNew Paradigms in Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure
Golse, N., Bucur, P. O., Adam, R., Castaing, D., Sa Cunha, A., & Vibert, E. (2013) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-012-2048-6 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamiya, S., Nagino, M., Kanazawa, H., Komatsu, S., Mayumi, T., Takagi, K., Asahara, T., Nomoto, K., Tanaka, R., & Nimura, Y.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 239
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-517
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052853518
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Value of Bile Replacement During External Biliary Drainage: An Analysis of Intestinal Permeability, Integrity, and Microflora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000118594.23874.89
- The paper
- Kamiya, S., Nagino, M., Kanazawa, H., Komatsu, S., Mayumi, T., Takagi, K., Asahara, T., Nomoto, K., Tanaka, R., & Nimura, Y. (2004). The Value of Bile Replacement During External Biliary Drainage: An Analysis of Intestinal Permeability, Integrity, and Microflora. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000118594.23874.89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.