The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic Nomogram for Patients Undergoing Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Background: Predictive nomograms are becoming increasingly used to define and predict outcome. They can be developed at presentation or following treatment and include variables not conventionally used in standard staging systems. Methods: We use a predictive nomogram based on prospectively collected data from 555 pancreatic resections for adenocarcinoma at a single institution. At last follow-up, 481 (87%) had died, defining a mature and comprehensive database. We used a 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up, as the number of patients alive beyond 3 years is sufficiently limited to provide insufficient events. Results: Based on a Cox model, we then developed a nomogram that predicts the probability that a patient will survive pancreatic cancer for 1, 2, and 3 years from the time of the initial resection, assuming that there is not death from an alternate cause. Calibration between observed and corrected is good, and variables not conventionally associated with standard staging systems improved the predictivity of the model. Conclusions: This nomogram can serve as a basis for investigating other potentially predictive variables that are proposed of prognostic importance for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Predictive nomograms for outcome provide the opportunity to include multiple predictive risk factors in a readily computed format that is widely applicable. We provide a simple nomogram for resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that provides greater accuracy in outcome prediction than conventional staging systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy
Collisson, E. A., Sadanandam, A., Olson, P., Gibb, W. J., Truitt, M., Gu, S., Cooc, J., Weinkle, J., Kim, G. E., Jakkula, L., et al. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2344 · Cited by 1,967
Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach
Chekroud, A. M., Zotti, R. J., Shehzad, Z., Gueorguieva, R., Johnson, M. K., Trivedi, M. H., Cannon, T. D., Krystal, J. H., & Corlett, P. R. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00471-x · Cited by 676
Gold, J. S., Gönen, M., Gutiérrez, A., Broto, J. M., García-del-Muro, X., Smyrk, T. C., Maki, R. G., Singer, S., Brennan, M. F., Antonescu, C. R., et al. (2009) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70242-6 · Cited by 507
Self-citationThe Lymph Node Ratio is the Strongest Prognostic Factor after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer
Riediger, H., Keck, T., Wellner, U., zur Hausen, A., Adam, U., Hopt, U. T., & Makowiec, F. (2009) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11605-009-0919-2 · Cited by 358
Association of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Survival in Patients With Stage II or III Gastric Cancer
Jiang, Y., Li, T., Liang, X., Hu, Y., Huang, L., Liao, Z., Zhao, L., Han, Z., Zhu, S., Wang, M., et al. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1087 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Brennan, M. F., Kattan, M. W., Klimstra, D., & Conlon, K.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 240
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-298
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071096730
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Nomogram for Patients Undergoing Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000133125.85489.07
- The paper
- Brennan, M. F., Kattan, M. W., Klimstra, D., & Conlon, K. (2004). Prognostic Nomogram for Patients Undergoing Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133125.85489.07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.