Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Bariatric Surgery in Older Patients

Open access
Sugerman, Harvey J., DeMaria, Eric J., Kellum, John M., Sugerman, Elizabeth L., Meador, Jill G., Wolfe, Luke G.·2004·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in older patients. BACKGROUND: Because of an increased morbidity in older patients who may not be as active as younger individuals, there remain concerns that they may not tolerate the operation well or lose adequate amounts of weight. METHODS: The database of patients who had undergone bariatric surgery since 1980 and National Death Index were queried for patients <60 and >/= 60 years of age. GBP was the procedure of choice after 1985. Data evaluated at 1 and 5 years included weight lost, % weight lost (%WL), % excess weight loss (%EWL), % ideal body weight (%IBW), mortality, complications, and obesity comorbidity. RESULTS: Eighty patients underwent bariatric surgery: age 63 +/- 3 years, 78% women, 68 white, 132 +/- 22 kg, BMI 49 +/- 7 kg/m, 217 +/- 32%IBW. Preoperative comorbidity, was greater (P < 0.001) in patients >/= 60 years. There were no operative deaths but 11 late deaths. COMPLICATIONS: 4 major wound infections, 2 anastomotic leaks, 10 symptomatic marginal ulcers, 5 stomal stenoses, 3 bowel obstructions, 26 incisional hernias (nonlaparoscopic), and 1 pulmonary embolism. At 1 year after surgery (94% follow-up), patients lost 38 +/- 11 kg, 57%EWL, 30%WL, BMI 34.5 +/- 7 kg/m, %IBW 153 +/- 31. Comorbidities decreased (P < 0.001); however, %WL and %EWL and improvement in hypertension and orthopedic problems, although significant, were greater in younger patients. At 5 years after surgery (58% follow-up), they had lost 31 +/- 18 kg, 50%EWL, 26%WL, BMI 35 +/- 8 kg/m, and %IBW 156 +/- 36. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery was effective for older patients with a low morbidity and mortality. Older patients had more pre- and post-operative comorbidities and lost less weight than younger patients. However the weight loss and improvement in comorbidities in older patients were clinically significant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000133361.68436.da

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Sugerman, H. J., DeMaria, E. J., Kellum, J. M., Sugerman, E. L., Meador, J. G., & Wolfe, L. G.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2004-08
Volume
240
Issue
2
Pages
243-247
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043392784
Cited by
238
References
3
FWCI
15.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Bariatric Surgery in Older Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000133361.68436.da
The paper
Sugerman, H. J., DeMaria, E. J., Kellum, J. M., Sugerman, E. L., Meador, J. G., & Wolfe, L. G. (2004). Effects of Bariatric Surgery in Older Patients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133361.68436.da

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.