Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extracorporeal Life Support for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Adults

Open access
Hemmila, Mark R., Rowe, Stephen A., Boules, Tamer N., Miskulin, Judiann, McGillicuddy, John W., Schuerer, Douglas J., Haft, Jonathan W., Swaniker, Fresca, Arbabi, Saman, Hirschl, Ronald B., Bartlett, Robert H.·2004·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with a high level of mortality. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) during severe ARDS maintains oxygen and carbon dioxide gas exchange while providing an optimal environment for recovery of pulmonary function. Since 1989, we have used a protocol-driven algorithm for treatment of severe ARDS, which includes the use of ECLS when standard therapy fails. The objective of this study was to evaluate our experience with ECLS in adult patients with severe ARDS with respect to mortality and morbidity. METHODS: We reviewed our complete experience with ELCS in adults from January 1, 1989, through December 31, 2003. Severe ARDS was defined as acute onset pulmonary failure, with bilateral infiltrates on chest x-ray, and PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio < or =100 or A-aDO2 >600 mm Hg despite maximal ventilator settings. The indication for ECLS was acute severe ARDS unresponsive to optimal conventional treatment. The technique of ECLS included veno-venous or veno-arterial vascular access, lung "rest" at low FiO2 and inspiratory pressure, minimal anticoagulation, and optimization of systemic oxygen delivery. RESULTS: During the study period, ECLS was used for 405 adult patients age 17 or older. Of these 405 patients, 255 were placed on ECLS for severe ARDS refractory to all other treatment. Sixty-seven percent were weaned off ECLS, and 52% survived to hospital discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the following pre-ELCS variables as significant independent predictors of survival: (1) age (P = 0.01); (2) gender (P = 0.048); (3) pH < or =7.10 (P = 0.01); (4) PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P = 0.03); and (5) days of mechanical ventilation (P < 0.001). None of the patients who survived required permanent mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen therapy. CONCLUSION: Extracorporeal life support for severe ARDS in adults is a successful therapeutic option in those patients who do not respond to conventional mechanical ventilator strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000141159.90676.2d

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Hemmila, M. R., Rowe, S. A., Boules, T. N., Miskulin, J., McGillicuddy, J. W., Schuerer, D. J., Haft, J. W., Swaniker, F., Arbabi, S., Hirschl, R. B., & Bartlett, R. H.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2004-10
Volume
240
Issue
4
Pages
595-607
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024820344
Cited by
401
References
2
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extracorporeal Life Support for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000141159.90676.2d
The paper
Hemmila, M. R., Rowe, S. A., Boules, T. N., Miskulin, J., McGillicuddy, J. W., Schuerer, D. J., Haft, J. W., Swaniker, F., Arbabi, S., Hirschl, R. B., & Bartlett, R. H. (2004). Extracorporeal Life Support for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Adults. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141159.90676.2d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.