The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Stage 0 Distal Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiation Therapy: Long-term Results
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective: Report overall long-term results of stage 0 rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and compare long-term results between operative and nonoperative treatment. Methods: Two-hundred sixty-five patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma considered resectable were treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) with 5-FU, Leucovorin and 5040 cGy. Patients with incomplete clinical response were referred to radical surgical resection. Patients with incomplete clinical response treated by surgery resulting in stage p0 were compared to patients with complete clinical response treated by nonoperative treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2, Student t test and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Overall and disease-free 10-year survival rates were 97.7% and 84%. In 71 patients (26.8%) complete clinical response was observed following CRT (Observation group). Twenty-two patients (8.3%) showed incomplete clinical response and pT0N0M0 resected specimens (Resection group). There were no differences between patient's demographics and tumor's characteristics between groups. In the Resection group, 9 definitive colostomies and 7 diverting temporary ileostomies were performed. Mean follow-up was 57.3 months in Observation Group and 48 months in Resection Group. There were 3 systemic recurrences in each group and 2 endorectal recurrences in Observation Group. Two patients in the Resection group died of the disease. Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 88% and 83%, respectively, in Resection Group and 100% and 92% in Observation Group. Conclusions: Stage 0 rectal cancer disease is associated with excellent long-term results irrespective of treatment strategy. Surgical resection may not lead to improved outcome in this situation and may be associated with high rates of temporary or definitive stoma construction and unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer may lead to complete clinical response or complete pathologic response in about 30% of patients. Seventy-one patients with complete clinical response followed by observation alone were compared with 22 patients with complete pathologic response following radical surgery. Radical surgery patients experienced high rates of stoma creation and unnecessary operative morbidity and mortality, without 5-year overall or disease-free survival advantage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preoperative Radiotherapy Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision for Resectable Rectal Cancer
Kapiteijn, E., Marijnen, C. A. M., Nagtegaal, I. D., Putter, H., Steup, W. H., Wiggers, T., Rutten, H. J. T., Pahlman, L., Glimelius, B., van Krieken, J. H. J. M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010580 · Cited by 4,205
Improved Survival with Preoperative Radiotherapy in Resectable Rectal Cancer
(1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704033361402 · Cited by 2,517
Preoperative Radiotherapy for Resectable Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Cammà, C., Giunta, M., Fiorica, F., Pagliaro, L., Craxì, A., & Cottone, M. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.8.1008 · Cited by 754
Cited by
Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Cercek, A., Roxburgh, C. S. D., Strombom, P., Smith, J. J., Temple, L. K. F., Nash, G. M., Guillem, J. G., Paty, P. B., Yaeger, R., Stadler, Z. K., et al. (2018) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0071 · Cited by 650
Battersby, N. J., Bouliotis, G., Emmertsen, K. J., Juul, T., Glynne-Jones, R., Branagan, G., Christensen, P., Laurberg, S., & Moran, B. J. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312695 · Cited by 245
Torres-Roca, J. F. (2012) · Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2217/pme.12.55 · Cited by 81
Sanoff, H. K., Moon, D. H., Moore, D. T., Boles, J., Bui, C., Blackstock, W., O'Neil, B. H., Subramaniam, S., McRee, A. J., Carlson, C., et al. (2019) · Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2019.02.021 · Cited by 72
Cuneo, K. C., Mehta, R. K., Kurapati, H., Thomas, D. G., Lawrence, T. S., & Nyati, M. K. (2019) · Translational Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2018.10.005 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Habr-Gama, A., Perez, R. O., Nadalin, W., Sabbaga, J., Ribeiro, U., Silva e Sousa, A. H., Campos, F. G., Kiss, D. R., & Gama-Rodrigues, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 240
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 711-718
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159919969
- Cited by
- 1,893
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Stage 0 Distal Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiation Therapy: Long-term Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000141194.27992.32
- The paper
- Habr-Gama, A., Perez, R. O., Nadalin, W., Sabbaga, J., Ribeiro, U., Silva e Sousa, A. H., Campos, F. G., Kiss, D. R., & Gama-Rodrigues, J. (2004). Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Stage 0 Distal Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiation Therapy: Long-term Results. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141194.27992.32
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.