Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 491

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Study

Open access
Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Battiston, Carlo, Perrone, Stefano, Pulvirenti, Andrea, Regalia, Enrico, Romito, Raffaele, Sarli, Dario, Schiavo, Marcello, Garbagnati, Francesco, Marchianò, Alfonso, Spreafico, Carlo, Camerini, Tiziana, Mariani, Luigi, Miceli, Rosalba, Andreola, Salvatore·2004·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine the histologic response-rate (complete versus partial tumor extinction) after single radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising in cirrhosis. Investigate possible predictors of response and assess efficacy and safety of RFA as a bridge to liver transplantation (OLT). BACKGROUND: RFA has become the elective treatment of local control of HCC, although histologic data supporting radiologic assessment of response are rare and prospective studies are lacking. Prognostic impact of repeated RFA for HCC persistence is also undetermined. METHODS: Percentage of RFA-induced necrosis and tumor persistence-rate at various intervals from treatment was studied in 60 HCC (median: 3 cm; Milan-Criteria IN: 80%) isolated in 50 consecutive cirrhotic patients undergoing OLT. Single-session RFA was the only treatment planned before OLT. Histologic response determined on explanted livers was related to 28 variables and to pre-OLT CT scan. RESULTS: Mean interval RFA-->OLT was 9.5 months. Post-RFA complete response rate was 55%, rising to 63% for HCC </=3 cm. Tumor size was the only prognostic factor significantly related to response (P = 0.007). Tumor satellites and/or new HCC foci (56 nodules) were unaffected by RFA and significantly correlated with HCC >3 cm (P = 0.05). Post-RFA tumor persistence probability increased with time (12 months: 59%; 18 months: 70%). Radiologic response rate was 70%, not significantly different from histology. Major post-RFA morbidity was 8%. No mortality, Child deterioration, patient withdrawal because of tumor progression was observed. Post-OLT 3-year patient/graft survival was 83%. CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a safe and effective treatment of small HCC in cirrhotics awaiting OLT, although tumor size (>3 cm) and time from treatment (>1 year) predict a high risk of tumor persistence in the targeted nodule. RFA should not be considered an independent therapy for HCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000143301.56154.95

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 491

Metadata

Authors
Mazzaferro, V., Battiston, C., Perrone, S., Pulvirenti, A., Regalia, E., Romito, R., Sarli, D., Schiavo, M., Garbagnati, F., Marchianò, A., Spreafico, C., Camerini, T., Mariani, L., Miceli, R., & Andreola, S.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2004-11
Volume
240
Issue
5
Pages
900-909
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045775115
Cited by
491
References
1
FWCI
15.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000143301.56154.95
The paper
Mazzaferro, V., Battiston, C., Perrone, S., Pulvirenti, A., Regalia, E., Romito, R., Sarli, D., Schiavo, M., Garbagnati, F., Marchianò, A., Spreafico, C., Camerini, T., Mariani, L., Miceli, R., & Andreola, S. (2004). Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Study. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000143301.56154.95

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.