Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Influences on the Management of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer and Its Cost-Effectiveness

Open access
Heinrich, Stefan, Goerres, Gerhard W., Schäfer, Markus, Sagmeister, Markus, Bauerfeind, Peter, Pestalozzi, Bernhard C., Hany, Thomas F., von Schulthess, Gustav K., Clavien, Pierre-Alain·2005·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: We sought to determine the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on the management of presumed resectable pancreatic cancer and to assess the cost of this new staging procedure. Summary Background Data: PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used for the staging of pancreatic cancer, but anatomic information is limited. Integrated PET/CT enables optimal anatomic delineation of PET findings and identification of FDG-negative lesions on computed tomography (CT) images and might improve preoperative staging. Material and Methods: Patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who had a PET/CT between June 2001 to April 2004 were entered into a prospective database. Routine staging included abdominal CT, chest x-ray, and CA 19-9 measurement. FDG-PET/CT was conducted according to a standardized protocol, and findings were confirmed by histology. Cost benefit analysis was performed based on charged cost of PET/CT and pancreatic resection and included the time frame of staging and surgery. Results: Fifty-nine patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 40–80 years) were included in this analysis. Fifty-one patients had lesions in the head and 8 in the tail of the pancreas. The positive and negative predictive values for pancreatic cancer were 91% and 64%, respectively. PET/CT detected additional distant metastases in 5 and synchronous rectal cancer in 2 patients. PET/CT findings changed the management in 16% of patients with pancreatic cancer deemed resectable after routine staging (P = 0.031) and was cost saving. Conclusions: PET/CT represents an important staging procedure prior to pancreatic resection for cancer, since it significantly improvespatient selection and is cost-effective. Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used for the staging of pancreatic cancer. Integrated PET/computed tomography offers the advantages of precise anatomic delineation of FDG-positive findings and additional detection of FDG-negative lesions. In this study, PET/computed tomography impacted on the oncologic management in 16% of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer and was cost-effective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Heinrich, S., Goerres, G. W., Schäfer, M., Sagmeister, M., Bauerfeind, P., Pestalozzi, B. C., Hany, T. F., von Schulthess, G. K., & Clavien, P.-A.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2005-08
Volume
242
Issue
2
Pages
235-243
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136155784
Cited by
321
References
1
FWCI
11.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Influences on the Management of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer and Its Cost-Effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84
The paper
Heinrich, S., Goerres, G. W., Schäfer, M., Sagmeister, M., Bauerfeind, P., Pestalozzi, B. C., Hany, T. F., von Schulthess, G. K., & Clavien, P.-A. (2005). Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Influences on the Management of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer and Its Cost-Effectiveness. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.