The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Multi-Institutional Analysis of the Socioeconomic Determinants of Breast Reconstruction: A Study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective: To determine the rate of postmastectomy reconstruction and investigate the impact of socioeconomic status on the receipt of reconstruction. Summary Background Data: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Outcomes Project is a prospective, multi-institutional database that contains data on all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients treated at one of the participating comprehensive cancer centers. Methods: The study cohort consisted of 2174 patients with DCIS and stage I, II, and III invasive breast cancer who underwent mastectomy at one of 8 NCCN centers. Rates of reconstruction were determined. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate whether socioeconomic characteristics are associated with breast reconstruction. Results: Overall, 42% of patients had breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Patients with Medicaid and Medicare were less likely to undergo reconstruction than those with managed care insurance; however, there was no difference for indemnity versus managed care insurance. Homemakers and retired patients had fewer reconstructions than those employed outside the home. Patients with a high school education or less were less likely to have reconstruction than those with more education. Race and ethnicity were not significant predictors of reconstruction. Conclusions: The reconstruction rate in this study (42%) is markedly higher than those previously reported. The type of insurance, education level, and employment status of a patient, but not her race or ethnicity, appear to influence the use of breast reconstruction. Because all patients were treated at an NCCN institution, these socioeconomic differences cannot be explained by access to care. The NCCN Outcomes Database is used to investigate current rates and socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction. Patients of lower socioeconomic status underwent fewer reconstructions after controlling for clinical and other demographic features. Because all patients are treated at comprehensive cancer centers, this variation cannot be explained by access to care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cemal, Y., Albornoz, C. R., Disa, J. J., McCarthy, C. M., Mehrara, B. J., Pusic, A. L., Cordeiro, P. G., & Matros, E. (2013) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31827cf576 · Cited by 284
Zhang, Y., Xu, H., Wang, T., He, J., Qiao, Y., Wei, J., & Dong, J. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144410 · Cited by 19
Viswanath (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.005 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Christian, C. K., Niland, J., Edge, S. B., Ottesen, R. A., Hughes, M. E., Theriault, R., Wilson, J., Hergrueter, C. A., & Weeks, J. C.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-249
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067440450
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of the Socioeconomic Determinants of Breast Reconstruction: A Study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000197738.63512.23
- The paper
- Christian, C. K., Niland, J., Edge, S. B., Ottesen, R. A., Hughes, M. E., Theriault, R., Wilson, J., Hergrueter, C. A., & Weeks, J. C. (2006). A Multi-Institutional Analysis of the Socioeconomic Determinants of Breast Reconstruction: A Study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000197738.63512.23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.