The DOI matches its Crossref record.
National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Risk Factors Can Be Used to Validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) Levels
Abstract
In Brief Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ Physical Status (ASA PS) classifications and the other National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) preoperative risk factors. Background: The ASA PS has been shown to predict morbidity and mortality in surgical patients but is inconsistently applied and clinically imprecise. It is desirable to have a method for validating ASA PS classification levels. Methods: The NSQIP preoperative risk factors, including ASA PS, were recorded from a random sample of 5878 surgical patients on 6 services between October 1, 2001 and September 30, 2003 at the University of Kentucky Medical Center. Mortality, morbidity, costs, and length of stay were obtained and compared across ASA PS levels. The ability of 1) ASA PS alone, 2) the other NSQIP risk factors, and, 3) all factors combined to predict outcomes was analyzed. A model using the other NSQIP risk factors was developed to predict ASA PS. Results: ASA PS alone was a strong predictor of outcomes (P < 0.01). However, the other NSQIP risk factors were better predictors as a group. There was significant interdependence between the ASA PS and the other NSQIP risk factors. Predictions of ASA PS using the other factors showed strong agreement with the anesthesiologists’ assignments. Conclusions: The NSQIP risk factors other than ASA PS can and should be used to validate ASA PS classifications. The American Society of Anesthesiology's Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) is known to be a strong predictor of surgical outcomes. However, the ASA PS is limited because it lacks clinical precision and is inconsistently applied by different anesthesiologists. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program tracks 60 preoperative risk factors, including the ASA PS. This study demonstrates that the other 59 risk factors are effective in predicting ASA PS and therefore can be used to validate ASA PS levels by hospital or anesthesiologist.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients
Makary, M. A., Segev, D. L., Pronovost, P. J., Syin, D., Bandeen-Roche, K., Patel, P., Takenaga, R., Devgan, L., Holzmueller, C. G., Tian, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.028 · Cited by 2,184
De Hert, S., Staender, S., Fritsch, G., Hinkelbein, J., Afshari, A., Bettelli, G., Bock, M., Chew, M. S., Coburn, M., De Robertis, E., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000000817 · Cited by 389
Development and validation of the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT)
Protopapa, K. L., Simpson, J. C., Smith, N. C. E., & Moonesinghe, S. R. (2014) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.9638 · Cited by 305
Rusanov, A., Weiskopf, N. G., Wang, S., & Weng, C. (2014) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-14-51 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Davenport, D. L., Bowe, E. A., Henderson, W. G., Khuri, S. F., & Mentzer, R. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 636-644
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991437594
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Risk Factors Can Be Used to Validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) Levels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000216508.95556.cc
- The paper
- Davenport, D. L., Bowe, E. A., Henderson, W. G., Khuri, S. F., & Mentzer, R. M. (2006). National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Risk Factors Can Be Used to Validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) Levels. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000216508.95556.cc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.