Periampullary and Pancreatic Incidentaloma: A Single Institution??s Experience With an Increasingly Common Diagnosis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While incidental masses in certain organs have received particular attention, periampullary and pancreatic incidentalomas (PIs) remain poorly characterized. METHODS: We reviewed 1944 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) over an 8-year period (April 1997 to October 2005). A total of 118 patients (6% of all PDs) presented with an incidental finding of a periampullary or pancreatic mass. The PI patients were analyzed and compared with the rest of the cohort (NI, nonincidentaloma group, n = 1826). RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of the PI patients (n = 37) had malignant disease (versus 76% of the NI patients, P < 0.001), 47% (n = 55) had premalignant disease, and the remaining 22% (n = 26) had little or no risk for malignant progression. The 3 most common diagnoses in the PI group were IPMN without invasive cancer (30%), cystadenoma (17%), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (10%). The PI group had a higher overall complication rate (55% versus 43%, P = 0.02), due in part to a significantly increased rate of pancreatic fistulas (18.4% PI versus 8.5% NI, P < 0.001). Patients in the PI group with malignant disease had a superior long-term survival (median, 30 months, P = 0.01) compared with patients in the NI group with malignant disease (median, 21 months). CONCLUSIONS: Incidentally discovered periampullary and pancreatic masses comprise a substantial proportion of patients undergoing PD. Roughly three fourths of these lesions are malignant or premalignant, and amenable to curative resection. Resected malignant PIs have favorable pathologic features as compared with resected malignant NIs, and resection of these early lesions in asymptomatic individuals is associated with improved survival, compared with patients with symptomatic disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Winter et al. reported a greater number of cases of stage 1 cancer and a better 5-year survival rate in incidentally detected pancreatic cancer.
“Winter et al. (15) reported a greater number of cases of stage 1 cancer and a better 5-year survival rate in incidentally detected pancreatic cancer.”
From Suspicious findings observed retrospectively on CT imaging performed before the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Screening for Pancreatic Cancer: Why, How, and Who?
Poruk, K. E., Firpo, M. A., Adler, D. G., & Mulvihill, S. J. (2013) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e31825ffbfb · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Cystic precursors to invasive pancreatic cancer
Matthaei, H., Schulick, R. D., Hruban, R. H., & Maitra, A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2011.2 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Self-citationPAM4-Reactive MUC1 Is a Biomarker for Early Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Gold, D. V., Karanjawala, Z., Modrak, D. E., Goldenberg, D. M., & Hruban, R. H. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1488 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationPancreatic solid incidentalomas
Santo, E., & Bar-Yishay, I. (2017) · Endoscopic Ultrasound · doi:10.4103/eus.eus_72_17 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Park, B. K., Koh, H. D., Won, S. Y., Cho, Y. S., Seo, J. H., An, C., & Park, S. (2023) · Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology · doi:10.21037/jgo-22-863 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Winter et al. (15) reported a greater number of cases of stage 1 cancer and a better 5-year survival rate in incidentally detected pancreatic cancer.”
- Authors
- Winter, J. M., Cameron, J. L., Lillemoe, K. D., Campbell, K. A., Chang, D., Riall, T. S., Coleman, J., Sauter, P. K., Canto, M., Hruban, R. H., Schulick, R. D., Choti, M. A., & Yeo, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Winter, Jordan M.
- Cameron, John L.
- Campbell, Kurtis A.
- Chang, David
- Coleman, JoAnn
- Schulick, Richard D.
- Choti, Michael A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 673-683
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056322315
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
- Keywords
- pancreaticoduodenectomy, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, pancreatic cystadenoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic fistula, postoperative complications, long-term survival, curative resection
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Common Bile Duct Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Ampulla of Vater, Incidental Findings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review