Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Difference in Tumor Invasiveness in Cirrhotic Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Fulfilling the Milan Criteria Treated by Resection and Transplantation: Impact on Long-term Survival

Open access
Poon, Ronnie T. P., Fan, Sheung Tat, Lo, Chung Mau, Liu, Chi Leung, Wong, John·2007·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Summary Background Data: Some previous studies demonstrated better survival after transplantation for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with resection, but the influence of differences in tumor invasiveness between transplanted and resected patients has not been studied. This study compared the tumor characteristics of patients with HCC within the Milan criteria treated by resection or transplantation, and elucidated their impact on long-term survival. Patients and Methods: Tumor characteristics and long-term survival of 204 cirrhotic patients with resection and 43 cirrhotic patients with transplantation for HCC within the Milan criteria were compared. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors of survival in all patients with resection or transplantation. Results: Tumors in the transplanted group were associated with lower incidence of high-grade tumors, microscopic venous invasion, and microsatellite nodules. The overall 5-year survival was better in the transplantation group than the resection group (81% vs. 68%, P = 0.017). However, there were no significant differences in survival between the two groups when stratified according to presence or absence of venous invasion. Multivariate analysis showed that hepatitis C virus serology, tumor size, tumor number, and microscopic venous invasion, but not resection or transplantation, were of prognostic significance. Conclusions: There were significant differences in tumor invasiveness in HCC treated by transplantation and resection as a result of selection bias, even in patients with the tumors fulfilling the Milan criteria. When the different tumor invasiveness was taken into account, there was no significant difference in the long-term survival after resection or transplantation. This study compared the tumor pathologic features and long-term survival of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) fulfilling the Milan criteria treated by resection or transplantation. The transplantation group appeared to have better survival than the resection group, but the survival of the two groups was similar when corrected for the higher frequency of microscopic venous invasion in the latter group. This study demonstrated the effect of a difference in tumor invasiveness on long-term survival of patients treated by resection or transplantation for apparently similar HCC according to the Milan criteria, highlighting the need to take into account such a difference when comparing survival after resection or transplantation for HCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000225255.01668.65

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Poon, R. T. P., Fan, S. T., Lo, C. M., Liu, C. L., & Wong, J.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2007-01
Volume
245
Issue
1
Pages
51-58
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997791444
Cited by
171
References
0
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Difference in Tumor Invasiveness in Cirrhotic Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Fulfilling the Milan Criteria Treated by Resection and Transplantation: Impact on Long-term Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000225255.01668.65
The paper
Poon, R. T. P., Fan, S. T., Lo, C. M., Liu, C. L., & Wong, J. (2007). Difference in Tumor Invasiveness in Cirrhotic Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Fulfilling the Milan Criteria Treated by Resection and Transplantation: Impact on Long-term Survival. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225255.01668.65

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.