Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Early Antibiotic Treatment for Severe Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Open access
Dellinger, E Patchen, Tellado, Jose M., Soto, Norberto E., Ashley, Stanley W., Barie, Philip S., Dugernier, Thierry, Imrie, Clement W., Johnson, Colin D., Knaebel, Hanns-Peter, Laterre, Pierre-Francois, Maravi-Poma, Enrique, Kissler, Jorge J. Olsina, Sanchez-Garcia, Miguel, Utzolino, Stefan·2007·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with severe, necrotizing pancreatitis, it is common to administer early, broad-spectrum antibiotics, often a carbapenem, in the hope of reducing the incidence of pancreatic and peripancreatic infections, although the benefits of doing so have not been proved. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study set in 32 centers within North America and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred patients with clinically severe, confirmed necrotizing pancreatitis: 50 received meropenem and 50 received placebo. INTERVENTIONS: Meropenem (1 g intravenously every 8 hours) or placebo within 5 days of the onset of symptoms for 7 to 21 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint: development of pancreatic or peripancreatic infection within 42 days following randomization. Other endpoints: time between onset of pancreatitis and the development of pancreatic or peripancreatic infection; all-cause mortality; requirement for surgical intervention; development of nonpancreatic infections within 42 days following randomization. RESULTS: Pancreatic or peripancreatic infections developed in 18% (9 of 50) of patients in the meropenem group compared with 12% (6 of 50) in the placebo group (P = 0.401). Overall mortality rate was 20% (10 of 50) in the meropenem group and 18% (9 of 50) in the placebo group (P = 0.799). Surgical intervention was required in 26% (13 of 50) and 20% (10 of 50) of the meropenem and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.476). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the treatment groups for pancreatic or peripancreatic infection, mortality, or requirement for surgical intervention, and did not support early prophylactic antimicrobial use in patients with severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000250414.09255.84

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Dellinger, E. P., Tellado, J. M., Soto, N. E., Ashley, S. W., Barie, P. S., Dugernier, T., Imrie, C. W., Johnson, C. D., Knaebel, H.-P., Laterre, P.-F., Maravi-Poma, E., Kissler, J. J. O., Sanchez-Garcia, M., & Utzolino, S.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2007-05
Volume
245
Issue
5
Pages
674-683
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986583614
Cited by
378
References
0
FWCI
37.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Antibiotic Treatment for Severe Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000250414.09255.84
The paper
Dellinger, E. P., Tellado, J. M., Soto, N. E., Ashley, S. W., Barie, P. S., Dugernier, T., Imrie, C. W., Johnson, C. D., Knaebel, H.-P., Laterre, P.-F., Maravi-Poma, E., Kissler, J. J. O., Sanchez-Garcia, M., & Utzolino, S. (2007). Early Antibiotic Treatment for Severe Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000250414.09255.84

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.