The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preventing Renal Failure in Patients with Rhabdomyolysis: Do Bicarbonate and Mannitol Make a Difference?
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The combination of bicarbonate and mannitol (BIC/MAN) is commonly used to prevent renal failure (RF) in patients with rhabdomyolysis despite the absence of sufficient evidence validating its use. The purpose of this study was to determine whether BIC/ MAN is effective in preventing RF in patients with rhabdomyolysis caused by trauma. METHODS: This study was a review of all adult trauma intensive care unit (ICU) admissions over 5 years (January 1997-September 2002). Creatine kinase (CK) levels were checked daily (abnormal,>520 U/L). RF was defined as a creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dL. Patients received BIC/MAN on the basis of the surgeon's discretion. RESULTS: Among 2,083 trauma ICU admissions, 85% had abnormal CK levels. Overall, RF occurred in 10% of trauma ICU patients. A CK level of 5,000 U/L was the lowest abnormal level associated with RF; 74 of 382 (19%) patients with CK greater than 5,000 U/L developed RF as compared with 143 of 1,701 (8%) patients with CK less than 5,000 U/L (p < 0.0001). Among patients with CK greater than 5,000 U/L, there was no difference in the rates of RF, dialysis, or mortality between those who received BIC/MAN and those who did not. Subanalysis of groups with various levels of CK still failed to show any benefit of BIC/MAN. CONCLUSION: Abnormal CK levels are common among critically injured patients, and a CK level greater than 5,000 U/L is associated with RF. BIC/MAN does not prevent RF, dialysis, or mortality in patients with creatine kinase levels greater than 5,000 U/L. The standard of administering BIC/MAN to patients with post-traumatic rhabdomyolysis should be reevaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rhabdomyolysis and Acute Kidney Injury
Bosch, X., Poch, E., & Grau, J. M. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0801327 · Cited by 1,488
KDOQI US Commentary on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury
Palevsky, P. M., Liu, K. D., Brophy, P. D., Chawla, L. S., Parikh, C. R., Thakar, C. V., Tolwani, A. J., Waikar, S. S., & Weisbord, S. D. (2013) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.349 · Cited by 935
Acute kidney injury due to rhabdomyolysis and renal replacement therapy: a critical review
Petejova, N., & Martinek, A. (2014) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc13897 · Cited by 444
Zimmerman, J. L., & Shen, M. C. (2013) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.12-2016 · Cited by 346
Drug-induced acute kidney injury
Schetz, M., Dasta, J., Goldstein, S., & Golper, T. (2005) · Current Opinion in Critical Care · doi:10.1097/01.ccx.0000184300.68383.95 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, C. V. R., Rhee, P., Chan, L., Evans, K., Demetriades, D., & Velmahos, G. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1191-1196
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000695569
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preventing Renal Failure in Patients with Rhabdomyolysis: Do Bicarbonate and Mannitol Make a Difference? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ta.0000130761.78627.10
- The paper
- Brown, C. V. R., Rhee, P., Chan, L., Evans, K., Demetriades, D., & Velmahos, G. C. (2004). Preventing Renal Failure in Patients with Rhabdomyolysis: Do Bicarbonate and Mannitol Make a Difference? The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000130761.78627.10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.