Cited by 32Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNursing care and research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Knowledge of Alzheimer's Disease Among Patients, Carers, and Noncarer Adults: Misconceptions, Knowledge Gaps, and Correct Beliefs

Sullivan, Karen, Muscat, Tracey, Mulgrew, Kate·2007·Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation

Abstract

Background: There is limited previous research that has examined level of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) knowledge and misconceptions using a structured questionnaire across a range of samples. To address this gap the current study investigated knowledge, knowledge gaps and misconceptions about AD in a sample of non-carers, caregivers, and individual's with Alzheimer's Disease. Method: A modified version of the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge (ADK) test was administered to 13 carers, 20 non-carer older adults, and 10 people with AD. Two sets of analyses were undertaken, first to identify group differences in the amount of knowledge reported by each group and second, to determine the nature of peoples' understanding of AD. Results: Overall level of knowledge in the three groups was quite poor. Whilst carers had significantly greater AD knowledge than non-carers or patients, carers correctly answered approximately 50% of items only. Relative to non-carers and AD patients, carers demonstrated a higher number of commonly held correct beliefs than participants in the other two groups, who held relatively few correct beliefs. All three groups had some misconceptions about AD. Conclusions: These findings suggest that education programs targeting the elderly community in general and AD patients specifically may be needed, but also that carer knowledge of AD could be further improved. Future educational interventions could be tailored to address the knowledge needs of each of the groups ident…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.tgr.0000270182.13650.79

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Dieckmann, 1988, The Alzheimers Disease Knowledge test., Gerontologist, 28, 402, 10.1093/geront/28.3.402 · DOI
  2. Laforce, 2005, Knowledge and fear of developing Alzheimers disease in a sample of healthy adults., Psychol Rep, 96, 204, 10.2466/pr0.96.1.204-206 · DOI
  3. Price, 1986, Elderly persons perceptions and knowledge of Alzheimers disease., Psychol Rep, 58, 419, 10.2466/pr0.1986.58.2.419 · DOI
  4. Karlin, 1998, Alzheimers disease knowledge: a comparison study., J Clin Geropsychol, 4, 211
  5. Sullivan, 2001, Providing education about Alzheimers disease., Aging Mental Health, 5, 5, 10.1080/13607860020020582 · DOI
  6. Beall, 1992, Education about Alzheimers disease: curricular implications for health professionals., Gerontol Geriatr Edu, 12, 93, 10.1300/J021v12n03_10 · DOI
  7. Edwards, 2000, Predictors of misconceptions of Alzheimers disease among community dwelling adults., Am J Alzheimers Dis, 15, 27, 10.1177/153331750001500103 · DOI
  8. Roberts, 2000, Illness representation among first-degree relatives of people with Alzheimers disease., Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 14, 129, 10.1097/00002093-200007000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Griffith, 1995, Knowledge and experience with Alzheimers disease. Relationship to resuscitation preference., Arch Fam Med, 4, 780, 10.1001/archfami.4.9.780 · DOI
  10. Wellwood, 1994, Perceptions and knowledge of stroke among surviving patients with stroke and their carers., Age Ageing, 23, 293, 10.1093/ageing/23.4.293 · DOI
  11. Mathers, 2001, Healthy life expectancy in 191 countries, 1999: World Health Organization Report 2000., The Lancet, 1357, 1685, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04824-8 · DOI
  12. Folstein, 1975, Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive status of patients for the clinician., J Psychiatr Res, 12, 189, 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chayer, 2002, The neurologic examination: brief mental status., J Geriatr Care, 1, 265
  14. Smith, 2004, The development of two new tools for assessing knowledge and beliefs about OSA and CPAP., Sleep Med, 5, 359, 10.1016/j.sleep.2003.12.007 · DOI
  15. Sullivan, 2005, Stroke knowledge and misconceptions among survivors of stroke and a non-stroke survivor sample., Top Stroke Rehabil, 12, 72, 10.1310/TJK4-V5W9-R5T7-GLEH · DOI
  16. Fillenbaum, 1996, The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimers Disease (CERAD). Part XIII. Obtaining autopsy in Alzheimers disease., Neurology, 46, 142, 10.1212/WNL.46.1.142 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Sullivan, K., Muscat, T., & Mulgrew, K.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation
Published
2007-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
137-148
ISSN
0882-7524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2314940637
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Queensland University of Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, health knowledge, misconceptions, caregivers, older adults, knowledge gaps, health education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge of Alzheimer's Disease Among Patients, Carers, and Noncarer Adults: Misconceptions, Knowledge Gaps, and Correct Beliefs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.tgr.0000270182.13650.79
The paper
Sullivan, K., Muscat, T., & Mulgrew, K. (2007). Knowledge of Alzheimer's Disease Among Patients, Carers, and Noncarer Adults: Misconceptions, Knowledge Gaps, and Correct Beliefs. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tgr.0000270182.13650.79