Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

WOUND-HEALING COMPLICATIONS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF SIROLIMUS AND TACROLIMUS1

Dean, Patrick G., Lund, William J., Larson, Timothy S., Prieto, Mikel, Nyberg, Scott L., Ishitani, Michael B., Kremers, Walter K., Stegall, Mark D.·2004·Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus has been associated with an increased risk of wound-healing complications in several retrospective analyses. The authors compared the rates of wound-healing complications in renal allograft recipients in a prospective, randomized trial of sirolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-prednisone versus tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-prednisone. METHODS: All patients received antithymocyte globulin induction. In the first phase of the study, patients (n = 77) were included regardless of body mass index (BMI). In the second phase (n = 46 patients), the authors excluded patients with a BMI greater than 32 kg/m2, and the target trough sirolimus level was lowered to 10 to 15 ng/mL (previously 15-20 ng/mL). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of wound complications. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received tacrolimus and 64 received sirolimus and were included in subsequent analyses. The incidence of complications was 8% (5 of 59) in the tacrolimus group and 47% (30 of 64) in the sirolimus group (P < 0.0001). Rates of perigraft fluid collections, superficial wound infections, and incisional herniae were significantly higher in the sirolimus group. Multivariate logistic regression showed only sirolimus (P = 0.0001) and BMI (P = 0.0021) to independently correlate with complications. In the first phase of the study, the wound complication rate in the sirolimus group was 55% (21 of 38 patients). After excluding obese recipients and decreasing the target sirolimus level, the wound complication rate in the sirolimus group was 35% (9 of 26 patients; P = 0.1040). CONCLUSIONS: The use of sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens leads to a higher incidence of wound-healing complications and will require new approaches to patient selection and management to decrease their incidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.tp.0000123082.31092.53

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Dean, P. G., Lund, W. J., Larson, T. S., Prieto, M., Nyberg, S. L., Ishitani, M. B., Kremers, W. K., & Stegall, M. D.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
2004-05-27
Volume
77
Issue
10
Pages
1555-1561
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984001665
Cited by
332
References
21
FWCI
16.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: WOUND-HEALING COMPLICATIONS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF SIROLIMUS AND TACROLIMUS1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.tp.0000123082.31092.53
The paper
Dean, P. G., Lund, W. J., Larson, T. S., Prieto, M., Nyberg, S. L., Ishitani, M. B., Kremers, W. K., & Stegall, M. D. (2004). WOUND-HEALING COMPLICATIONS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF SIROLIMUS AND TACROLIMUS1. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000123082.31092.53

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.