Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 970

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation: Interdisciplinary Analyses and Recommendations

Hirsch, Hans H., Brennan, Daniel C., Drachenberg, Cinthia B., Ginevri, Fabrizio, Gordon, Jennifer, Limaye, Ajit P., Mihatsch, Michael J., Nickeleit, Volker, Ramos, Emilio, Randhawa, Parmjeet, Shapiro, Ron, Steiger, Juerg, Suthanthiran, Manikkam, Trofe, Jennifer·2005·Transplantation

Abstract

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an emerging cause of kidney transplant failure affecting 1-10% of patients. As uncertainty exists regarding risk factors, diagnosis, and intervention, an independent panel of experts reviewed the currently available evidence and prepared this report. Most cases of PVAN are elicited by BK virus (BKV) in the context of intense immunosuppression. No specific immunosuppressive drug is exclusively associated with PVAN, but most cases reported to date arise while the patient is on triple immunosuppressive combinations, often comprising tacrolimus and/or mycophenolate mofetil plus corticosteroids. Immunologic control of polyomavirus replication can be achieved by reducing, switching, and/or discontinuing components of the immunosuppressive regimen, but the individual's risk of rejection should be considered. The success rate of this intervention is increased with earlier diagnosis. Therefore, it is recommended that all renal transplant recipients should be screened for BKV replication in the urine: 1) every three months during the first two years posttransplant; 2) when allograft dysfunction is noted; and 3) when allograft biopsy is performed. A positive screening result should be confirmed in <4 weeks and assessed by quantitative assays (e.g. BKV DNA or RNA load in plasma or urine). Definitive diagnosis of PVAN requires allograft biopsy. If PVAN and concurrent acute rejection is diagnosed, antirejection treatment should be considered, coupled with subsequently reducing immunosuppression. The antiviral cidofovir is not approved for PVAN, but investigational use at low doses (0.25-0.33 mg/kg intravenously biweekly) without probenicid should be considered for refractory cases. Retransplantation after renal allograft loss to PVAN remains a treatment option for patients clearing polyomavirus replication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.tp.0000156165.83160.09

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 970

Metadata

Authors
Hirsch, H. H., Brennan, D. C., Drachenberg, C. B., Ginevri, F., Gordon, J., Limaye, A. P., Mihatsch, M. J., Nickeleit, V., Ramos, E., Randhawa, P., Shapiro, R., Steiger, J., Suthanthiran, M., & Trofe, J.
Venue
Transplantation
Published
2005-05-27
Volume
79
Issue
10
Pages
1277-1286
ISSN
0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067222383
Cited by
970
References
0
FWCI
26.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation: Interdisciplinary Analyses and Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.tp.0000156165.83160.09
The paper
Hirsch, H. H., Brennan, D. C., Drachenberg, C. B., Ginevri, F., Gordon, J., Limaye, A. P., Mihatsch, M. J., Nickeleit, V., Ramos, E., Randhawa, P., Shapiro, R., Steiger, J., Suthanthiran, M., & Trofe, J. (2005). Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Renal Transplantation: Interdisciplinary Analyses and Recommendations. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000156165.83160.09

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.