The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maintenance Immunosuppression with Target-of-Rapamycin Inhibitors is Associated with a Reduced Incidence of De Novo Malignancies
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive drug therapy has been identified as one etiological factor in the increased incidence of and deaths from malignancies in renal transplant recipients. In animal models, calcineurin inhibitors have a positive growth effect, whereas target-of-rapamycin (TOR) inhibitors have a negative growth effect on malignant cells. METHODS: A multivariate analysis of posttransplant malignancies in 33,249 deceased donor primary solitary renal recipients reported by 264 kidney transplant programs to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database from July 1, 1996 to December 31, 2001 was performed. Data were censored at 963 days to allow comparable follow-up time among drug treatment groups. The incidence and relative risks of any de novo malignancy (skin and solid) and for non-skin solid malignancies in patients receiving TOR inhibitors compared to patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: The incidence rates of patients with any de novo posttransplant malignancy were 0.60% with sirolimus/everolimus alone, 0.60% with sirolimus/everolimus + cyclosporine/tacrolimus, and 1.81% with cyclosporine/tacrolimus (P<0.0001); the rates with a de novo solid tumor were 0%, 0.47%, and 1.00%, respectively. In the Cox regression model the relative risk associated with sirolimus/everolimus immunosuppression for any de novo cancer was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.24-0.64; P=0.0002) and for de novo solid cancer was 0.44 (0.24-0.82; P=0.0092). Other significant risk factors were male sex, adult age group, white race, and history of a malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance immunosuppression with the TOR inhibitor drugs, sirolimus and everolimus, is associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing any posttransplant de novo malignancy and non-skin solid malignancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vigneri, P., Frasca, F., Sciacca, L., Pandini, G., & Vigneri, R. (2009) · Endocrine Related Cancer · doi:10.1677/erc-09-0087 · Cited by 1,009
Sirolimus and Secondary Skin-Cancer Prevention in Kidney Transplantation
Euvrard, S., Morelon, E., Rostaing, L., Goffin, E., Brocard, A., Tromme, I., Broeders, N., del Marmol, V., Chatelet, V., Dompmartin, A., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1204166 · Cited by 593
Geissler, E. K., Schnitzbauer, A. A., Zülke, C., Lamby, P. E., Proneth, A., Duvoux, C., Burra, P., Jauch, K.-W., Rentsch, M., Ganten, T. M., et al. (2016) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000000965 · Cited by 433
Immunosuppressive Therapy and Malignancy in Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review
Gutierrez-Dalmau, A., & Campistol, J. M. (2007) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200767080-00006 · Cited by 408
Knoll, G. A., Kokolo, M. B., Mallick, R., Beck, A., Buenaventura, C. D., Ducharme, R., Barsoum, R., Bernasconi, C., Blydt-Hansen, T. D., Ekberg, H., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g6679 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Kauffman, H. M., Cherikh, W. S., Cheng, Y., Hanto, D. W., & Kahan, B. D.
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 883-889
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008200942
- Cited by
- 621
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maintenance Immunosuppression with Target-of-Rapamycin Inhibitors is Associated with a Reduced Incidence of De Novo Malignancies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.tp.0000184006.43152.8d
- The paper
- Kauffman, H. M., Cherikh, W. S., Cheng, Y., Hanto, D. W., & Kahan, B. D. (2005). Maintenance Immunosuppression with Target-of-Rapamycin Inhibitors is Associated with a Reduced Incidence of De Novo Malignancies. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000184006.43152.8d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.