Cited by 115Higher Education Research StudiesMedical Education and AdmissionsDiversity and Career in Medicine

How Leaky Is the Health Career Pipeline? Minority Student Achievement in College Gateway Courses

Alexander, Charles, Chen, Eric, Grumbach, Kevin·2009·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether underrepresented minority (URM) students receive lower grades than do non-URM students in college prehealth gateway courses; the extent to which lower grade performance might be explained by the differences in precollege academic achievement; and whether URM students are less likely than non-URM students to persist in completing at least four gateway courses. Method Administrative data were obtained from six California colleges on 15,000 college students who matriculated in the 1999-2000 or 2000-2001 academic years and enrolled in at least one college course required for application to medical or dental school ("gateway" courses). Students were compared across ethnic groups in gateway course grade performance and persistence in completing at least four gateway courses, using regression methods to control for students' college admission test scores and caliber of high school attended. Results URM students received significantly lower grades on average in gateway courses than did white students. This gap persisted after adjusting for measures of prior academic performance. However, URM students were nearly as likely as white students to persist in completing at least four gateway courses. After accounting for the lower grades of URM students in their initial classes, URM students were more likely than white students to complete four or more gateway courses. Conclusions URM students experienced academic challenges, but many persist in their prehealth…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181a3d948

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, C., Chen, E., & Grumbach, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Alexander, Charles
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2009-06
Volume
84
Issue
6
Pages
797-802
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043729990
Cited by
115
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • San Francisco State University
  • California Endowment
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
underrepresented minority students, achievement gap, grade performance, student persistence, medical school diversity
MeSH terms
California, Career Choice, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Education, Premedical, Educational Measurement, Female, Health Occupations, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Predictive Value of Tests, School Admission Criteria, Schools, Dental, Schools, Medical, Student Dropouts, Universities, Databases, Factual, Cultural Diversity, Needs Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review