The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How, When, and Why Do Physicians Choose Careers in Academic Medicine? A Literature Review
Abstract
PURPOSE: Medicine has different pathways in which physicians pursue their vocation. Clinical practice, research, and academia are common paths. The authors examined the literature to identify research-based factors influencing physicians to choose a career path in academic medicine. METHOD: In the fall of 2006, the authors searched the PubMed database from 1960 to 2006 using the term career academic medicine. Review of articles resulted in the identification of nine themes relating to academic medicine career paths. The authors summarized the important and relevant articles to capture what the literature contributed as a whole to the larger question, "How, when, and why do physicians choose an academic career in medicine?" RESULTS: A synthesis of articles revealed that (1) values are essential to understanding the decision to enter a career in academic medicine, (2) factors associated with academic medicine career choice include research-oriented programs, gender, and mentors and role models, (3) an obstacle to pursuing this career path is loss of interest in academic careers during residency as residents learn about factors associated with academic careers in medicine, and (4) debt may be a barrier to choosing an academic career in medicine for some individuals in some specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the study findings, the larger question (stated above) remains essentially unanswered in the literature. The authors propose a call to action by various professional groups and organizations to use rigorous and complex research efforts to seek answers to this very important question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mentoring in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review
Sambunjak, D., Straus, S. E., & Marušić, A. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1103 · Cited by 1,689
Cited by
Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence
Edmunds, L. D., Ovseiko, P. V., Shepperd, S., Greenhalgh, T., Frith, P., Roberts, N. W., Pololi, L. H., & Buchan, A. M. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01091-0 · Cited by 309
The Vanishing Physician Scientist: A Critical Review and Analysis
Gordon, R. (2012) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2012.660076 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Borges, N. J., Navarro, A. M., Grover, A., & Hoban, J. D.
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 680-686
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010440536
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How, When, and Why Do Physicians Choose Careers in Academic Medicine? A Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d29cb9
- The paper
- Borges, N. J., Navarro, A. M., Grover, A., & Hoban, J. D. (2010). How, When, and Why Do Physicians Choose Careers in Academic Medicine? A Literature Review. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181d29cb9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.