Cited by 2Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can Extended-release Injectable Medications Help Curb United States and Canada's Opioid Overdose Epidemic?

Open access
Socías, M. Eugenia, Nolan, Seonaid·2021·Journal of Addiction Medicine

Abstract

Settings throughout the United States and Canada continue to face escalating overdose epidemics. Notably, history of overdose is associated with increased risk of fatal overdose. Unfortunately, despite frequent contact with health services and the well-known mortality benefits of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), only a fraction of overdose survivors is successfully linked to addiction care after leaving the emergency department. This may be partially explained by well-documented challenges of oral MOUD, including the need for frequent visits to the pharmacy to receive their medications, which may limit the flexibility to acquire or sustain employment, and therefore contribute to high rates of opioid addiction care discontinuation. This commentary discusses the potential fit of different extended-release injectable MOUD to circumvent limitations of oral formulations, and thereby improve linkage and retention in care of high-risk populations, such as opioid-overdose survivors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adm.0000000000000697

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Otterstatter, 2018, Patterns of health care utilization among people who overdosed from illegal drugs: a descriptive analysis using the BC Provincial Overdose Cohort, Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can, 38, 328, 10.24095/hpcdp.38.9.04 · DOI
  2. Sordo, 2017, Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, BMJ, 357, j1550, 10.1136/bmj.j1550 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Caudarella, 2016, Non-fatal overdose as a risk factor for subsequent fatal overdose among people who inject drugs, Drug Alcohol Depend, 162, 51, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.02.024 · DOI
  4. Sharma, 2017, Update on barriers to pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorders, Curr Psychiatry Rep, 19, 35, 10.1007/s11920-017-0783-9 · DOI
  5. Richardson, 2012, Addiction treatment-related employment barriers: the impact of methadone maintenance, J Subst Abuse Treat, 43, 276, 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.12.008 · DOI
  6. Morgan, 2019, Overdose following initiation of naltrexone and buprenorphine medication treatment for opioid use disorder in a United States commercially insured cohort, Drug Alcohol Depend, 200, 34, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.031 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lofwall, 2018, Weekly and monthly subcutaneous buprenorphine depot formulations vs daily sublingual buprenorphine with naloxone for treatment of opioid use disorder: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Intern Med, 178, 764, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1052 · DOI
  8. Haight, 2019, Efficacy and safety of a monthly buprenorphine depot injection for opioid use disorder: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, Lancet, 393, 778, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32259-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Neale, 2019, Prolonged-release opioid agonist therapy: qualitative study exploring patients’ views of 1-week, 1-month, and 6-month buprenorphine formulations, Harm Reduct J, 16, 25, 10.1186/s12954-019-0296-4 · DOI
  10. Saunders, 2020, Perceptions and preferences for long-acting injectable and implantable medications in comparison to short-acting medications for opioid use disorders, J Subst Abuse Treat, 111, 54, 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Socías, M. E., & Nolan, S.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2020-06-18
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
15-17
ISSN
  • 1932-0620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-3227
OpenAlex
W3037562523
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R25DA037756)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
medication-assisted treatment, opioid overdose epidemic, retention in care, pharmacy visits, barriers to employment
MeSH terms
Opiate Overdose, Canada, Humans, Opioid-Related Disorders, United States, Epidemics, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review