Factors Related to Agreement Between Child and Caregiver Report of Child Functioning With Chronic Pain: PROMIS Pediatric and Parent Proxy Report
Abstract
Objectives Valid and efficient assessment of patient-reported outcomes remains a priority to guide pain treatment and research. PROMIS pediatric self-report and parent proxy measures offer feasible and rigorous evaluation of functioning in children with chronic conditions, including pain. A key challenge is determining the usefulness of multisource information from children and caregivers for understanding pain and function. Our primary aim examined child-caregiver agreement across child functioning domains. Our secondary aim examined child and caregiver factors associated with the child-caregiver agreement. Materials and methods A sample of 806 children with chronic pain (Mage=14.50 y; 72% female individuals) and a caregiver (Mage=45.82 y; 85% mothers) completed PROMIS pediatric self-report and parent proxy measures of anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, and mobility before intake in an interdisciplinary outpatient pediatric chronic pain program. Results The agreement was poor to good depending on the evaluation method (effect size, intraclass correlation, and clinical significance interpretation). Caregivers generally reported worse child symptoms across domains compared with child self-report. The greatest discrepancy was observed for child anxiety, pain interference, and peer relations, with the greatest agreement for child mobility. The greater caregiver-child discrepancy was found for younger children, girls, with a higher child or caregiver pain catastroph…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parents' perceptions of their child's symptoms may influence healthcare utilization and quality of care provided to the child.
“Even so, parents’ perceptions of their child’s symptoms should be taken into account, because they may influence healthcare utilization and quality of care provided to the child [18,19].”
From COVID-19-Related Anxiety Symptoms among Quarantined Adolescents and Its Impact on Sleep Pattern Changes and Somatic Symptoms (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 69 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Birnie, K. A., Richardson, P. A., Rajagopalan, A. V., & Bhandari, R. P.
- Affiliations
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Birnie, Kathryn A.
- Venue
- The Clinical Journal of Pain
- Published
- 2019-12-23
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-212
- ISSN
- 0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996899025
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
- Keywords
- pediatric chronic pain, parent proxy reporting, patient-reported outcomes, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, mobility (physical function), peer relationships, caregiver health, multi-informant assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Proxy, Self Report, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review