Cited by 38Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Factors Related to Agreement Between Child and Caregiver Report of Child Functioning With Chronic Pain: PROMIS Pediatric and Parent Proxy Report

Birnie, Kathryn A., Richardson, Patricia A., Rajagopalan, Adithi V., Bhandari, Rashmi P.·2020·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives Valid and efficient assessment of patient-reported outcomes remains a priority to guide pain treatment and research. PROMIS pediatric self-report and parent proxy measures offer feasible and rigorous evaluation of functioning in children with chronic conditions, including pain. A key challenge is determining the usefulness of multisource information from children and caregivers for understanding pain and function. Our primary aim examined child-caregiver agreement across child functioning domains. Our secondary aim examined child and caregiver factors associated with the child-caregiver agreement. Materials and methods A sample of 806 children with chronic pain (Mage=14.50 y; 72% female individuals) and a caregiver (Mage=45.82 y; 85% mothers) completed PROMIS pediatric self-report and parent proxy measures of anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, and mobility before intake in an interdisciplinary outpatient pediatric chronic pain program. Results The agreement was poor to good depending on the evaluation method (effect size, intraclass correlation, and clinical significance interpretation). Caregivers generally reported worse child symptoms across domains compared with child self-report. The greatest discrepancy was observed for child anxiety, pain interference, and peer relations, with the greatest agreement for child mobility. The greater caregiver-child discrepancy was found for younger children, girls, with a higher child or caregiver pain catastroph…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000794

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 38

Authors
Birnie, K. A., Richardson, P. A., Rajagopalan, A. V., & Bhandari, R. P.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Birnie, Kathryn A.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2019-12-23
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
203-212
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996899025
Cited by
38
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
pediatric chronic pain, parent proxy reporting, patient-reported outcomes, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, mobility (physical function), peer relationships, caregiver health, multi-informant assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Parents, Quality of Life, Caregivers, Proxy, Self Report, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review