Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 560

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 361 of the 361 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement on Assessment of Pain in Older Persons

Hadjistavropoulos, Thomas, Herr, Keela, Turk, Dennis C., Fine, Perry G., Dworkin, Robert H., Helme, Robert, Jackson, Kenneth, Parmelee, Patricia A., Rudy, Thomas E., Lynn Beattie, B., Chibnall, John T., Craig, Kenneth D., Ferrell, Betty, Ferrell, Bruce, Fillingim, Roger B., Gagliese, Lucia, Gallagher, Romayne, Gibson, Stephen J., Harrison, Elizabeth L., Katz, Benny, Keefe, Francis J., Lieber, Susan J., Lussier, David, Schmader, Kenneth E., Tait, Raymond C., Weiner, Debra K., Williams, Jaime·2007·The Clinical Journal of Pain
DOI 10.1097/ajp.0b013e31802be869
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper represents an expert-based consensus statement on pain assessment among older adults. It is intended to provide recommendations that will be useful for both researchers and clinicians. Contributors were identified based on literature prominence and with the aim of achieving a broad representation of disciplines. Recommendations are provided regarding the physical examination and the assessment of pain using self-report and observational methods (suitable for seniors with dementia). In addition, recommendations are provided regarding the assessment of the physical and emotional functioning of older adults experiencing pain. The literature underlying the consensus recommendations is reviewed. Multiple revisions led to final reviews of 2 complete drafts before consensus was reached.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0b013e31802be869

Cites

361 of 361 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 361 references

Cited by

See all 560

Metadata

Authors
Hadjistavropoulos, T., Herr, K., Turk, D. C., Fine, P. G., Dworkin, R. H., Helme, R., Jackson, K., Parmelee, P. A., Rudy, T. E., Lynn Beattie, B., Chibnall, J. T., Craig, K. D., Ferrell, B., Ferrell, B., Fillingim, R. B., Gagliese, L., Gallagher, R., Gibson, S. J., Harrison, E. L., Katz, B., Keefe, F. J., Lieber, S. J., Lussier, D., Schmader, K. E., Tait, R. C., Weiner, D. K., & Williams, J.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2007-01
Volume
23
Issue
Supplement 1
Pages
S1-S43
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/ajp.0b013e31802be869
OpenAlex
W1970369207
Cited by
560
References
361
FWCI
31.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement on Assessment of Pain in Older Persons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ajp.0b013e31802be869
The paper
Hadjistavropoulos, T., Herr, K., Turk, D. C., Fine, P. G., Dworkin, R. H., Helme, R., Jackson, K., Parmelee, P. A., Rudy, T. E., Lynn Beattie, B., Chibnall, J. T., Craig, K. D., Ferrell, B., Ferrell, B., Fillingim, R. B., Gagliese, L., Gallagher, R., Gibson, S. J., Harrison, E. L., . . . Williams, J. (2007). An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement on Assessment of Pain in Older Persons. The Clinical Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0b013e31802be869

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.