Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 662

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

De Facto Long-term Opioid Therapy for Noncancer Pain

Open access
Korff, Michael Von, Saunders, Kathleen, Thomas Ray, Gary, Boudreau, Denise, Campbell, Cynthia, Merrill, Joseph, Sullivan, Mark D., Rutter, Carolyn M., Silverberg, Michael J., Banta-Green, Caleb, Weisner, Constance·2008·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes characteristics of opioid use episodes for noncancer pain and defines thresholds for de facto long-term opioid therapy. METHODS: CONSORT (CONsortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends) includes adult members of 2 health plans serving over 1% of the US population. Opioid use episodes beginning in the years 1997 to 2005 were classified as acute, episodic, long-term/lower dose, or long-term/higher dose. RESULTS: On the basis of evaluation of the likelihood of opioid use continuing, long-term opioid therapy was defined by episodes lasting longer than 90 days with 10+ opioid prescriptions or 120+ days supply of opioids dispensed. Long-term/higher dose episodes (<1.5% of all opioid use episodes) were characterized by daily or near daily use, a mean duration of about 1000 days, and an average daily dose of about 55 mg. They accounted for more than half the total morphine equivalents dispensed from the years 1997 to 2006. Short-acting, non-Schedule II opioids (eg, hydrocodone with acetaminophen) were, by far, the most commonly prescribed medications for acute, episodic, and long-term episodes. Long-acting (sustained-release) opioids were the predominately prescribed medication in a minority of long-term episodes (6% to 12%). DISCUSSION: Long-term opioid therapy was characterized by the diversity in medications prescribed, dosage levels, and frequency of use. The proposed threshold for long-term opioid therapy provides a checkpoint for physicians to review whether an explicit decision to sustain opioid therapy has been reached, and to ensure that a documented treatment plan and provisions for monitoring medication use and patient outcomes are in place.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0b013e318169d03b

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 662

Metadata

Authors
Korff, M. V., Saunders, K., Thomas Ray, G., Boudreau, D., Campbell, C., Merrill, J., Sullivan, M. D., Rutter, C. M., Silverberg, M. J., Banta-Green, C., & Weisner, C.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2008-07
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
521-527
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990355279
Cited by
662
References
1
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: De Facto Long-term Opioid Therapy for Noncancer Pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ajp.0b013e318169d03b
The paper
Korff, M. V., Saunders, K., Thomas Ray, G., Boudreau, D., Campbell, C., Merrill, J., Sullivan, M. D., Rutter, C. M., Silverberg, M. J., Banta-Green, C., & Weisner, C. (2008). De Facto Long-term Opioid Therapy for Noncancer Pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0b013e318169d03b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.