Opioid Cessation and Multidimensional Outcomes After Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Treatment
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although the efficacy of interdisciplinary treatment for chronic noncancer pain has been well-established in the literature, there is limited research examining interdisciplinary programs that require opioid cessation. As the long-term use of opioid analgesics remains controversial, further investigation is warranted. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associations between opioid cessation and subsequent multidomain treatment outcomes among veterans admitted to a pain rehabilitation program at a large Veterans Affairs tertiary care hospital in the southeastern United States. METHODS: A retrospective design examined the medical records of 705 consecutive admissions comparing those using opioids at admission with those who were not. Participants taking opioids agreed to taper off of these medications using a "pain cocktail" approach; otherwise patients received identical treatment. Outcome measures were administered at program admission and discharge. RESULTS: Repeated measures analyses were used to compare responses across time. Those who completed the program (n=600) demonstrated improvement in all outcome measures from admission to discharge, and the opioid group improved as much or more than the nonopioid group on all measures despite opioid cessation during treatment. DISCUSSION: Results indicated that both groups experienced significant improvement on outcome measures, and that opioid analgesic use at admission had no discernible impact on treatment outcome in this large sample of veterans with moderate to severe chronic pain syndrome. The clinical implications of these findings for long-term chronic pain treatment, in light of the risks associated with opioid analgesics, are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effectiveness of integrated interdisciplinary chronic pain programs on improving multi-dimensional pain outcomes is well-established in VA settings.
“The effectiveness of integrated interdisciplinary chronic pain programs on improving multi-dimensional pain outcomes is well-established in VA settings [32–36].”
From Benchmark findings from a veteran electronic patient-reported outcomes evaluation from a chronic pain management telehealth program (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Murphy, J. L., Clark, M. E., & Banou, E.
- Affiliations
- James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Murphy, Jennifer L.
- Clark, Michael E.
- Banou, Evangelia
- Venue
- The Clinical Journal of Pain
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-117
- ISSN
- 0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062284108
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- opioid cessation, chronic non-cancer pain, interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation, veterans, opioid tapering, treatment outcomes, chronic pain syndromes, opioid analgesics
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Analgesics, Opioid, Analysis of Variance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Patient Admission, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Sleep Wake Disorders, Time Factors, Southeastern United States, Chi-Square Distribution, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Withholding Treatment, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review