Cited by 21Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryDietary Effects on HealthAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Baseline Gastric Volume in Fasting Diabetic Patients Is Not Higher than That in Nondiabetic Patients: A Cross-sectional Noninferiority Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The physiology of diabetes mellitus can increase the risk of perioperative aspiration, but there is limited and contradictory evidence on the incidence of "full stomach" in fasting diabetic patients. The aim of this study is to assess the baseline gastric content (using gastric ultrasound) in diabetic and nondiabetic patients scheduled for elective surgery who have followed standard preoperative fasting instructions. METHODS: This was a prospective, noninferiority study of 180 patients (84 diabetic and 96 nondiabetic patients). Bedside ultrasound was used for qualitative and quantitative assessment of the gastric antrum in the supine and right lateral decubitus positions. Fasting gastric volume was estimated based on the cross-sectional area of the gastric antrum and a validated model. The hypothesis was that diabetic patients would not have a higher baseline fasting gastric volume compared to nondiabetic patients, with a noninferiority margin of 0.4 ml/kg. Secondary aims included the comparison of the incidence of full stomach (solid content or more than 1.5 mL/kg of clear fluid), estimation of the 95th percentile of the gastric volume distribution in both groups, and examination of the association between gastric volume, glycemic control, and diabetic comorbidities. RESULTS: The baseline gastric volume was not higher in diabetic patients (0.81 ± 0.61 ml/kg) compared to nondiabetic patients (0.87 ± 0.53 ml/kg) with a mean difference of -0.07 ml/kg (95% CI, -0.24 to 0.10 ml/kg). A total of 13 (15.5%) diabetic and 11 (11.5%) nondiabetic patients presented more than 1.5 ml/kg of gastric volume (95% CI for difference, -7.1 to 15.2%). There was little correlation between the gastric volume and either the time since diagnosis or HbA1C. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the baseline gastric volume in diabetic patients who have followed standard fasting instructions is not higher than that in nondiabetic patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000004815

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Cook, 2012, Complications and failure of airway management., Br J Anaesth, 109, i68, 10.1093/bja/aes393 · DOI
  2. Xiao, 2021, Gastric content and perioperative pulmonary aspiration in patients with diabetes mellitus: A scoping review., Br J Anaesth, 127, 224, 10.1016/j.bja.2021.04.008 · DOI
  3. 2017, Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: Application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration., Anesthesiology, 126, 376, 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001452 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Perlas, 2018, Point-of-care gastric ultrasound and aspiration risk assessment: A narrative review., Can J Anaesth, 65, 437, 10.1007/s12630-017-1031-9 · DOI
  5. Van de Putte, 2018, The link between gastric volume and aspiration risk: In search of the Holy Grail?, Anaesthesia, 73, 274, 10.1111/anae.14164 · DOI
  6. Tokumine, 2005, Unanticipated full stomach at anesthesia induction in a type I diabetic patient with asymptomatic gastroparesis., J Anesth, 19, 247, 10.1007/s00540-005-0321-5 · DOI
  7. Cubillos, 2012, Bedside ultrasound assessment of gastric content: An observational study., Can J Anaesth, 59, 416, 10.1007/s12630-011-9661-9 · DOI
  8. Perlas, 2011, Gastric sonography in the fasted surgical patient: A prospective descriptive study., Anesth Analg, 113, 93, 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821b98c0 · DOI
  9. Perlas, 2009, Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume., Anesthesiology, 111, 82, 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a97250 · DOI
  10. Perlas, 2013, Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination., Anesth Analg, 116, 357, 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318274fc19 · DOI
  11. Kruisselbrink, 2017, Ultrasound assessment of gastric volume in severely obese individuals: A validation study., Br J Anaesth, 118, 77, 10.1093/bja/aew400 · DOI
  12. Kruisselbrink, 2014, Intra and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound assessment of gastric volume., Anesthesiology, 121, 46, 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000193 · DOI
  13. Garg, 2020, Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study., Indian J Anaesth, 64, 391, 10.4103/ija.IJA_796_19 · DOI
  14. Sharma, 2018, Preoperative assessment of gastric contents and volume using bedside ultrasound in adult patients: A prospective, observational, correlation study., Indian J Anaesth, 62, 753, 10.4103/ija.IJA_147_18 · DOI
  15. Reed, 2020, Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Relationships between preoperative physiologic stress, gastric content volume and quality, and risk of pulmonary aspiration., AANA J, 88, 465
  16. Sabry, 2019, Evaluation of gastric residual volume in fasting diabetic patients using gastric ultrasound., Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 63, 615, 10.1111/aas.13315 · DOI
  17. Zhou, 2019, Point-of-care ultrasound defines gastric content in elective surgical patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study., BMC Anesthesiol, 19, 179, 10.1186/s12871-019-0848-x · DOI
  18. Rousset, 2022, Ultrasound assessment of the gastric content among diabetic and non-diabetic patients before elective surgery: A prospective multicenter study., Minerva Anestesiol, 88, 23, 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15603-2 · DOI
  19. Van de Putte, 2019, Term pregnant patients have similar gastric volume to non-pregnant females: A single-centre cohort study., Br J Anaesth, 122, 79, 10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.025 · DOI
  20. Valencia, 2019, Chewing gum for 1 h does not change gastric volume in healthy fasting subjects: A prospective observational study., J Clin Anesth, 56, 100, 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.01.021 · DOI
  21. Frykholm, 2022, Pre-operative fasting in children: A guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care., Eur J Anaesthesiol, 39, 4, 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001599 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Perlas, A., Xiao, M. Z. X., Tomlinson, G., Jacob, B., Abdullah, S., Kruisselbrink, R., & Chan, V. W. S.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2023-10-26
Volume
140
Issue
4
Pages
648-656
ISSN
  • 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1175
OpenAlex
W4387965304
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
gastric volume, diabetes mellitus, preoperative fasting, gastric aspiration, gastric ultrasound, gastric antrum, elective surgery, glycemic control, HbA1c, full stomach, non-inferiority
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Fasting, Humans, Prospective Studies, Pyloric Antrum, Stomach, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review