Cited by 147Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsPain Management and Placebo Effect

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Subanesthetic Ketamine on Intrinsic Functional Brain Connectivity: A Placebo-controlled Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Healthy Male Volunteers

Open access
Niesters, Marieke, Khalili-Mahani, Najmeh, Martini, Christian, Aarts, Leon, van Gerven, Joop, van Buchem, Mark A., Dahan, Albert, Rombouts, Serge·2012·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: The influence of psychoactive drugs on the central nervous system has been investigated with positron emission tomography and task-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. However, it is not known how these drugs affect the intrinsic large-scale interactions of the brain (resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity). In this study, the effect of low-dose S(+)-ketamine on intrinsic brain connectivity was investigated. Methods: Twelve healthy, male volunteers received a 2-h intravenous S(+)-ketamine infusion (first hour 20 mg/70 kg, second hour 40 mg/70 kg). Before, during, and after S(+)-ketamine administration, resting-state brain connectivity was measured. In addition, heat pain tests were performed between imaging sessions to determine ketamine-induced analgesia. A mixed-effects general linear model was used to determine drug and pain effects on resting-state brain connectivity. Results: Ketamine increased the connectivity most importantly in the cerebellum and visual cortex in relation to the medial visual network. A decrease in connectivity was observed in the auditory and somatosensory network in relation to regions responsible for pain sensing and the affective processing of pain, which included the amygdala, insula, and anterior cingulate cortex. Connectivity variations related to fluctuations in pain scores were observed in the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and the brainstem, regions involved in descending inhibition of pain. Conclusions: Changes in connectivity were observed in the areas that explain ketamine's pharmacodynamic profile with respect to analgesia and psychedelic and other side effects. In addition, pain and ketamine changed brain connectivity in areas involved in endogenous pain modulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0b013e31826a0db3

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–147 of 147

Metadata

Authors
Niesters, M., Khalili-Mahani, N., Martini, C., Aarts, L., van Gerven, J., van Buchem, M. A., Dahan, A., & Rombouts, S.
Affiliations
  • PhD Student.
  • Senior Research Associate.
  • PhD Student, Resident.
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Professor, Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, and Center for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Professor, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition (LIBC) and Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center.
  • Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2012-10-01
Volume
117
Issue
4
Pages
868-877
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056836466
Cited by
147
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
subanesthetic ketamine, resting-state functional connectivity, intrinsic brain connectivity, ketamine analgesia, pain modulation, cerebellum, visual cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, amygdala, descending pain inhibition, psychedelic effects, ketamine side effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Anesthetics, Dissociative, Brain, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Hallucinogens, Hot Temperature, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Injections, Intravenous, Ketamine, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Pain, Pain Measurement, Linear Models, Single-Blind Method, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review