The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vaginal Estrogen for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively review and critically assess the literature on vaginal estrogen and its alternatives for women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause and to provide clinical practice guidelines. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to April 2013. We included randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies. Interventions and comparators included all commercially available vaginal estrogen products. Placebo, no treatment, systemic estrogen (all routes), and nonhormonal moisturizers and lubricants were included as comparators. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We double-screened 1,805 abstracts, identifying 44 eligible studies. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Studies were individually and collectively assessed for methodologic quality and strength of evidence. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Studies were extracted for participant, intervention, comparator, and outcomes data, including patient-reported atrophy symptoms (eg, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, dysuria, urgency, frequency, recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI), and urinary incontinence), objective signs of atrophy, urodynamic measures, endometrial effects, serum estradiol changes, and adverse events. Compared with placebo, vaginal estrogens improved dryness, dyspareunia, urinary urgency, frequency, and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). Urinary tract infection rates decreased. The various estrogen preparations had similar efficacy and safety; serum estradiol levels remained within postmenopausal norms for all except high-dose conjugated equine estrogen cream. Endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma were extremely rare among those receiving vaginal estrogen. Comparing vaginal estrogen with nonhormonal moisturizers, patients with two or more symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy were substantially more improved using vaginal estrogens, but those with one or minor complaints had similar symptom resolution with either estrogen or nonhormonal moisturizer. CONCLUSION: All commercially available vaginal estrogens effectively relieve common vulvovaginal atrophy-related complaints and have additional utility in patients with urinary urgency, frequency or nocturia, SUI and UUI, and recurrent UTIs. Nonhormonal moisturizers are a beneficial alternative for those with few or minor atrophy-related symptoms and in patients at risk for estrogen-related neoplasia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42013006656.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Atkins, D., Eccles, M., Flottorp, S., Guyatt, G. H., Henry, D., Hill, S., Liberati, A., O'Connell, D., Oxman, A. D., Phillips, B., et al. (2004) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-4-38 · Cited by 1,235 · cited 1×
“We considered methodologic quality, consistency of results across studies, directness of evidence, and other factors such as imprecision or sparseness of evidence to determine an overall quality of evidence in accordance with the Grades for Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, which categoriz…”
MethodSemi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews
Wallace, B. C., Trikalinos, T. A., Lau, J., Brodley, C., & Schmid, C. H. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-55 · Cited by 351
Cited by
The 2022 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society
(2022) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000002028 · Cited by 977
Portman, D. J., & Gass, M. L. S. (2014) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000329 · Cited by 688
Management of sexual dysfunction in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review
Seav, S. M., Dominick, S. A., Stepanyuk, B., Gorman, J. R., Chingos, D. T., Ehren, J. L., Krychman, M. L., & Su, H. I. (2015) · Women s Midlife Health · doi:10.1186/s40695-015-0009-4 · Cited by 59
Rahn, D. D., Richter, H. E., Sung, V. W., Larsen, W. I., & Hynan, L. S. (2021) · Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000000899 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahn, D. D., Carberry, C., Sanses, T. V., Mamik, M. M., Ward, R. M., Meriwether, K. V., Olivera, C. K., Abed, H., Balk, E. M., & Murphy, M.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1147-1156
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968357961
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaginal Estrogen for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0000000000000526
- The paper
- Rahn, D. D., Carberry, C., Sanses, T. V., Mamik, M. M., Ward, R. M., Meriwether, K. V., Olivera, C. K., Abed, H., Balk, E. M., & Murphy, M. (2014). Vaginal Estrogen for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: A Systematic Review. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000526
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.