Cited by 49Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPregnancy and Medication Impact

Adverse Outcomes and Potential Targets for Intervention in Gestational Diabetes and Obesity

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of obesity with pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and identify potentially modifiable risk factors for adverse outcomes in obese women with GDM. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,344 women with GDM who delivered between 2009 and 2012. Demographic data, blood sugar values, gestational weight gain, and maternal and neonatal outcome data were abstracted from the medical record and compared among normal-weight, overweight, and obese women. RESULTS: Overweight and obese women had higher mean fasting and postprandial blood sugars despite higher doses of and more frequent use of medication. Obesity was independently associated with macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.89, P=.03), indicated preterm birth (adjusted OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.02-4.78, P=.04), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.38-3.49, P=.001). In our stratified analyses, obese women with fasting blood sugars greater than 88.7 mg/dL and postprandial blood sugars greater than 123.8 mg/dL had higher rates of macrosomia (13.1% compared with 5.7%, P=.004 for fasting, 13.0% compared with 6.5%, P=.01 for postprandial blood sugars) and indicated preterm birth (11.4% compared with 6.1%, P=.04 for fasting, 11.9% compared with 5.8%, P=.01 for postprandial blood sugars) when compared with obese women with lower values. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were significantly increased in obese women with postdiagnosis weight gain greater than 0.6 lb per week (29.4% compared with 15.2%, P<.001) when compared with obese women with less weight gain. CONCLUSION: Prepregnancy obesity is independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM, and interventions to optimize glycemic control and limit weight gain postdiagnosis may improve outcomes in these high-risk women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000000928

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scifres, C., Feghali, M., Althouse, A. D., Caritis, S., & Catov, J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2015-08
Volume
126
Issue
2
Pages
316-325
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1055773974
Cited by
49
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, pre-pregnancy obesity, adverse pregnancy outcomes, macrosomia, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, glycemic control, gestational weight gain, neonatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Medical Records, Problem-Oriented, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, United States, Weight Gain, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review