Adverse Outcomes and Potential Targets for Intervention in Gestational Diabetes and Obesity
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of obesity with pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and identify potentially modifiable risk factors for adverse outcomes in obese women with GDM. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,344 women with GDM who delivered between 2009 and 2012. Demographic data, blood sugar values, gestational weight gain, and maternal and neonatal outcome data were abstracted from the medical record and compared among normal-weight, overweight, and obese women. RESULTS: Overweight and obese women had higher mean fasting and postprandial blood sugars despite higher doses of and more frequent use of medication. Obesity was independently associated with macrosomia (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.89, P=.03), indicated preterm birth (adjusted OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.02-4.78, P=.04), and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.38-3.49, P=.001). In our stratified analyses, obese women with fasting blood sugars greater than 88.7 mg/dL and postprandial blood sugars greater than 123.8 mg/dL had higher rates of macrosomia (13.1% compared with 5.7%, P=.004 for fasting, 13.0% compared with 6.5%, P=.01 for postprandial blood sugars) and indicated preterm birth (11.4% compared with 6.1%, P=.04 for fasting, 11.9% compared with 5.8%, P=.01 for postprandial blood sugars) when compared with obese women with lower values. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were significantly increased in obese women with postdiagnosis weight gain greater than 0.6 lb per week (29.4% compared with 15.2%, P<.001) when compared with obese women with less weight gain. CONCLUSION: Prepregnancy obesity is independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM, and interventions to optimize glycemic control and limit weight gain postdiagnosis may improve outcomes in these high-risk women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Excessive GWG in women with GDM worsens hyperglycaemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes, although specific GWG targets remain undefined.
“Excessive GWG in women with GDM worsens hyperglycaemia [41] and adverse pregnancy outcomes [42,43,44], although specific GWG targets remain undefined.”
From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes
Carpenter, M. W., & Coustan, D. R. (1982) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0 · Cited by 1,924 · see citing works
Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes in Obese Women: How Much Is Enough?
Kiel, D. W., Dodson, E. A., Artal, R., Boehmer, T. K., & Leet, T. L. (2007) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000278819.17190.87 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Hartling, L., Dryden, D. M., Guthrie, A., Muise, M., Vandermeer, B., & Donovan, L. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00661 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Fetal and neonatal outcomes of diabetic pregnancies
Yang, J., Cummings, E. A., OʼConnell, C., & Jangaard, K. (2006) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000231688.08263.47 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weight gain adequacy and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: a meta‐analysis
Viecceli, C., Remonti, L. R., Hirakata, V. N., Mastella, L. S., Gnielka, V., Oppermann, M. L. R., Silveiro, S. P., & Reichelt, A. J. (2017) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12521 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Gestational diabetes: weight gain during pregnancy and its relationship to pregnancy outcomes
Gou, B.-H., Guan, H.-M., Bi, Y.-X., & Ding, B.-J. (2019) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000000036 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Shi, P., Liu, A., & Yin, X. (2021) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03982-4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Wu, Q., Chen, Y., Ma, H., Zhou, T., Hu, Y., Liang, Z., & Chen, D. (2023) · Nutrition & Diabetes · doi:10.1038/s41387-023-00239-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Cheong, L., Law, L. S.-C., Tan, L. Y. L., Amal, A. A.-A., Khoo, C. M., & Eng, P. C. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17071210 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Scifres, C., Feghali, M., Althouse, A. D., Caritis, S., & Catov, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 316-325
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1055773974
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 7.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, maternal obesity, pre-pregnancy obesity, adverse pregnancy outcomes, macrosomia, preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, glycemic control, gestational weight gain, neonatal outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Fetal Macrosomia, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Medical Records, Problem-Oriented, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, United States, Weight Gain, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Premature Birth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review