Cited by 487Maternal and fetal healthcareGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Recent Increases in the U.S. Maternal Mortality Rate: Disentangling Trends From Measurement Issues

Open access
MacDorman, Marian F., Declercq, Eugene, Cabral, Howard, Morton, Christine·2016·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop methods for trend analysis of vital statistics maternal mortality data, taking into account changes in pregnancy question formats over time and between states, and to provide an overview of U.S. maternal mortality trends from 2000 to 2014. METHODS: This observational study analyzed vital statistics maternal mortality data from all U.S. states in relation to the format and year of adoption of the pregnancy question. Correction factors were developed to adjust data from before the standard pregnancy question was adopted to promote accurate trend analysis. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze trends for groups of states with similar pregnancy questions. RESULTS: The estimated maternal mortality rate (per 100,000 live births) for 48 states and Washington, DC (excluding California and Texas, analyzed separately) increased by 26.6%, from 18.8 in 2000 to 23.8 in 2014. California showed a declining trend, whereas Texas had a sudden increase in 2011-2012. Analysis of the measurement change suggests that U.S. rates in the early 2000s were higher than previously reported. CONCLUSION: Despite the United Nations Millennium Development Goal for a 75% reduction in maternal mortality by 2015, the estimated maternal mortality rate for 48 states and Washington, DC, increased from 2000 to 2014; the international trend was in the opposite direction. There is a need to redouble efforts to prevent maternal deaths and improve maternity care for the 4 million U.S. women giving birth each year.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000001556

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal mortality has decreased in most developed countries over the past two decades, but recent reports show it has increased in the US.

    “While maternal mortality has decreased in most developed countries over the past two decades, recent reports show maternal mortality has increased in the United States (US) [2, 3].”

    From Age-related disparities in national maternal mortality trends: A population-based study (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Discussion reports that the estimated maternal mortality rate increased in 48 states and Washington, D.C., from 2000 to 2014, while WHO reported decreases in 157 of 183 countries from 2000 to 2013. It does not establish that mortality decreased specifically in most developed countries over the past two decades. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [4]Lawson GW Keirse MJNC Reflections on the maternal mortality millennium goal Birth 2013 40 2 96 102 24635463
  2. [5]Hogan MC Foreman KJ Naghavi M Ahn SY Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: A systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5 Lancet 2010 375 9726 1609 23 20382417
  3. [6]Hoyert DL Maternal mortality and related concepts. National Center for Health Statistics Vital Health Stat 3 33 2007 17460868
  4. [7]MacKay AP Berg CJ Duran C Chang J Rosenberg H An assessment of pregnancy-related mortality in the United States Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2005 5 19 3 206 14 15860079
  5. [8]Horon H Cheng D Enhanced surveillance for pregnancy-associated mortality – Maryland, 1993–1998 JAMA 285 11 1455 9 2001 11255421
  6. [10]Xu J Murphy SL Kochanek KD Bastian BA Deaths: Final data for 2013 National vital statistics reports 54 2 Hyattsville, MD National Center for Health Statistics 2016 Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_02.pdf Accessed March 1, 2016 (and prior reports published annually) 26905861
  7. [11]Minino AM Murphy SL Xu J Kochanek KD Deaths: Final data for 2008 National vital statistics report 59 10 National Center for Health Statistics 2011 Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_10.pdf Accessed March 1, 2016 22808755
  8. [14]Creanga AA Berg CJ Ko JY Farr SL Tong VT Bruce C Callaghan WM Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: Where are we now? Journal of Women’s Health 2014 23 1 3 9 PMC3880915 24383493
  9. [15]Creanga AA Berg CJ Syverson C Seed K Bruce FC Callaghan WM Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States 2006–2010 Obstet Gynecol 2015 125 1 5 12 25560097
  10. [23]Main EK McCain CL Morton CH Holtby S Lawton ES Pregnancy-related mortality in California: Causes, characteristics, and improvement opportunities Obstet Gynecol 2015 125 4 938 947 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000746 25751214 · DOI
  11. [26]Stevenson AJ Flores-Vasquez IM Allgeyer RL Schenkkan P Potter JE Effect of removal of Planned Parenthood from the Texas Women’s Health Program NEJM 2016 374 9 853 60 26836435 PMC5129844
  12. [28]MacKay AP Berg CJ Liu X Duran C Hoyert DL Changes in pregnancy mortality ascertainment United States 1999–2005 Obstet Gynecol 2011 118 1 104 110 21691169
  13. [29]Malloy MH MacDorman MF Changes in the classification of sudden unexpected infant deaths: United States 1992–2001 Pediatrics 2005 115 1247 53 15867031

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDorman, M. F., Declercq, E., Cabral, H., & Morton, C.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
MacDorman, Marian F.
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2016-09
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
447-455
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515728566
Cited by
487
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 17
FWCI
60.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041041)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
maternal mortality, maternal mortality trends, joinpoint regression, state-level trends, California, Texas, Millennium Development Goals, obstetric care, United States
MeSH terms
Adult, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Maternal Mortality, Mortality, Pregnancy, United States, Perinatal Care, Live Birth, Quality Improvement, Maternal Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review