Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obstetric Care Consensus No. 6: Periviable Birth

·2017·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Approximately 0.5% of all births occur before the third trimester of pregnancy, and these very early deliveries result in the majority of neonatal deaths and more than 40% of infant deaths. A recent executive summary of proceedings from a joint workshop defined periviable birth as delivery occurring from 20 0/7 weeks to 25 6/7 weeks of gestation. When delivery is anticipated near the limit of viability, families and health care teams are faced with complex and ethically challenging decisions. Multiple factors have been found to be associated with short-term and long-term outcomes of periviable births in addition to gestational age at birth. These include, but are not limited to, nonmodifiable factors (eg, fetal sex, weight, plurality), potentially modifiable antepartum and intrapartum factors (eg, location of delivery, intent to intervene by cesarean delivery or induction for delivery, administration of antenatal corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate), and postnatal management (eg, starting or withholding and continuing or withdrawing intensive care after birth). Antepartum and intrapartum management options vary depending upon the specific circumstances but may include short-term tocolytic therapy for preterm labor to allow time for administration of antenatal steroids, antibiotics to prolong latency after preterm premature rupture of membranes or for intrapartum group B streptococci prophylaxis, and delivery, including cesarean delivery, for concern regarding fetal well-being or fetal malpresentation. Whenever possible, periviable births for which maternal or neonatal intervention is planned should occur in centers that offer expertise in maternal and neonatal care and the needed infrastructure, including intensive care units, to support such services. This document describes newborn outcomes after periviable birth, provides current evidence and recommendations regarding interventions in this setting, and provides an outline for family counseling with the goal of incorporating informed patient preferences. Its intent is to provide support and guidance regarding decisions, including declining and accepting interventions and therapies, based on individual circumstances and patient values.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000002352

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Mehler, 2012, Outcome of extremely low gestational age newborns after introduction of a revised protocol to assist preterm infants in their transition to extrauterine life, Acta Paediatr, 101, 1232, 10.1111/apa.12015 · doi:10.1111/apa.12015
  2. Kyser, 2012, Improving survival of extremely preterm infants born between 22 and 25 weeks of gestation, Obstet Gynecol, 119, 795, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824b1a03 · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31824b1a03
  3. Shlossman, 1997, An analysis of neonatal morbidity and mortality in maternal (in utero) and neonatal transports at 24-34 weeks’ gestation, Am J Perinatol, 14, 449, 10.1055/s-2007-994178 · doi:10.1055/s-2007-994178
  4. Hohlagschwandtner, 2001, Perinatal mortality and morbidity. Comparison between maternal transport, neonatal transport and inpatient antenatal treatment, Arch Gynecol Obstet, 265, 113, 10.1007/s004040100197 · doi:10.1007/s004040100197
  5. 2007, ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Obstet Gynecol, 110, 1203
  6. 2017, Committee Opinion No. 700. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Obstet Gynecol, 129, e150
  7. 2016, Practice Bulletin No. 171. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Obstet Gynecol, 128, e155
  8. 2014, Practice Bulletin No. 142. American College of Obste-tricians and Gynecologists, Obstet Gynecol, 123, 372
  9. Althuisius, 2003, Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189, 907, 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00718-X · doi:10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00718-x
  10. Debby, 2007, Favorable outcome following emergency second trimester cerclage, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 96, 16, 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.09.002 · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.09.002
  11. Stupin, 2008, Emergency cerclage versus bed rest for amniotic sac prolapse before 27 gestational weeks. A retrospective, comparative study of 161 women, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 139, 32, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.11.009 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.11.009
  12. Wylie, 2008, Method of delivery and neonatal outcome in very low-birthweight vertex-presenting fetuses, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 198, 640.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.038 · DOI
  13. Tucker Edmonds, 2015, Morbidity and mortality associated with mode of delivery for breech periviable deliveries, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.002 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.002
  14. Chervenak, 2007, An ethically jus-tified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions, J Obstet Gynaecol, 27, 3, 10.1080/01443610601133605 · doi:10.1080/01443610601133605

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2017-10
Volume
130
Issue
4
Pages
e187-e199
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980823390
Cited by
253
References
43
FWCI
18.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obstetric Care Consensus No. 6: Periviable Birth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0000000000002352
The paper
Obstetric Care Consensus No. 6: Periviable Birth. (2017). Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002352

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.