Screening and treatment after implementation of a universal perinatal depression screening program
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether initiation of an institutional policy of universal perinatal depression screening was associated with sustained increases in frequency in screening and of depression treatment subsequent to a positive screen. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women receiving prenatal care in outpatient offices at a single academic medical center from 2008 to 2015. In 2009, an institutional policy of universal perinatal depression screening was disseminated in which screening twice antenatally and again postpartum were recommended. The frequency of screen completion at each recommended time point was compared between the prepolicy and postpolicy cohorts. A test of trend that assessed the frequency of screening each year after policy initiation was used to assess changes over time. The frequency with which care plans were created for women who screened positive for perinatal depression were compared before and after implementation. RESULTS: Of the 5,127 women who met inclusion criteria, 4,005 (78%) were in the postpolicy cohort. The frequency of completion of depression screening at the first prenatal visit (0.1% vs 65.5%), in the third trimester (0.0% vs 42.7%), and at the postpartum visit (69.5% vs 90.0%) increased after initiation of the policy (P<.001 for all). The improvement in postpartum depression screening completion persisted after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 5.3, 95% CI 4.4–6.5). After the initial increase in uptake of screening, the frequency of screening at the first and third trimester prenatal visits continued to increase over time (P<.001 for each), although this frequency remained stable for the postpartum visit (P=.29). Women with a positive postpartum depression screen were more likely to have depression treatment recommended or provided by their obstetrician postpolicy (64.7% vs 30.1%, P<.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of an institutional policy of universal perinatal depression screening was associated with improvements in perinatal depression screening with concomitant improvements in depression treatment recommendations for women with a positive postpartum depression screen.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social justice activism led to legislative actions mandating universal screening of new mothers for depression and their active participation in clinical research.
“This unfolded in parallel with social justice activism that ultimately led to legislative actions mandating the universal screening of new mothers for depression and their active participation in clinical research (5–8).”
From A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams, Jr., Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., Hoffing, M., Della Penna, R. D., Noël, P. H., Lin, E. H. B., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.22.2836 · Cited by 2,405 · see citing works
Grote, N. K., Bridge, J. A., Gavin, A. R., Melville, J. L., Iyengar, S., & Katon, W. J. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.111 · Cited by 1,882 · see citing works
Wisner, K. L., Sit, D. K. Y., McShea, M. C., Rizzo, D. M., Zoretich, R. A., Hughes, C. L., Eng, H. F., Luther, J. F., Wisniewski, S. R., Costantino, M. L., et al. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.87 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
Self-citationBruce, M. L., Ten Have, T. R., Reynolds III, C. F., Katz, I. I., Schulberg, H. C., Mulsant, B. H., Brown, G. K., McAvay, G. J., Pearson, J. L., & Alexopoulos, G. S. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.9.1081 · Cited by 963 · see citing works
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 757: Screening for Perinatal Depression
(2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002927 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Depressive Symptoms among Pregnant Women Screened in Obstetrics Settings
Marcus, S. M., Flynn, H. A., Blow, F. C., & Barry, K. L. (2003) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/154099903765448880 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Improving Care for Depression in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Melville, J. L., Reed, S. D., Russo, J., Croicu, C. A., Ludman, E., LaRocco-Cockburn, A., & Katon, W. (2014) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000231 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ACOG Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines–Obstetrics (2023) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000005200 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry
Athan, A. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1364845 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Miller, E. S., Wisner, K. L., Gollan, J., Hamade, S., Gossett, D. R., & Grobman, W. A.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 303-309
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2961941569
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001422)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD050121)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- perinatal depression, universal screening, institutional policy, screening uptake, postpartum depression, prenatal care, depression treatment, care planning, policy implementation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Clinical Protocols, Depression, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Illinois, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Prenatal Care, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Perinatal Care, Depression, Postpartum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review