Immediate Postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Measures and 2-Year Risk of Prolapse Recurrence
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether resting genital hiatus, perineal body, and total vaginal length measured intraoperatively at the conclusion of surgery are associated with prolapse recurrence 2 years after native tissue pelvic organ prolapse reconstruction. METHODS: This ancillary analysis of the OPTIMAL (Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss) trial included women who had an immediate postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination and 2-year follow-up. Primary outcome was bothersome bulge symptoms. Secondary outcomes were anatomic failure, surgical failure (either anatomic failure or bothersome bulge symptoms), and sexual function. Descriptive statistics assessed relationships between postprocedure POP-Q measures and these four outcomes. Multivariable models were fit to the data to control for baseline differences in bivariate comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to identify an optimal genital hiatus cut point associated with bothersome bulge, and this threshold was explored. RESULTS: This analysis included 368 participants. Bivariate analyses identified age, body mass index, vaginal deliveries, baseline genital hiatus, perineal body, and advanced POP-Q stage (3 or higher vs 2) as clinically relevant variables to include in multivariable models. After adjusting for these variables, the association between immediate postoperative genital hiatus and bothersome bulge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.4; 95% CI 0.9-2.1) was not significant at the P<.05 level; however, immediate postoperative genital hiatus was associated with anatomic (aOR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.3) and surgical failure (aOR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.1). Immediate postoperative genital hiatus of 3.5 cm was the selected cutoff (area under the curve 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.66 from the bothersome bulge model). Women with genital hiatus 3.5 cm or greater were more likely to have anatomic and surgical failures at 2 years. No POP-Q measures were correlated with 2-year sexual function. CONCLUSION: A larger immediate postoperative genital hiatus measurement of 3.5 cm or greater is not associated with bothersome bulge symptoms or sexual dysfunction but is associated with anatomic and surgical failures 2 years after native tissue vaginal reconstructive surgery.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Very few studies report on risk factors for recurrent POP with composite or subjective outcome measures after native tissue repair.
“Very few studies report on risk factors for recurrent POP with composite or subjective outcome measures after native tissue repair [16,17].”
From The External Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Recurrent Pelvic Organ Prolapse After Native Tissue Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Siff, L. N., Barber, M. D., Zyczynski, H. M., Rardin, C. R., Jakus-Waldman, S., Rahn, D. D., Smith, A. L., Mazloomdoost, D., Sridhar, A., Gantz, M. G., & for the NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- RTI International (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2020-09-08
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 792-801
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-233X
- PMC
- PMC7526641
- OpenAlex
- W3086781042
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10HD041261, UG1HD041261, UG1HD069006, U10HD054214, U10HD069010, U10HD069006, U01HD069031, U10HD069013, U10HD041267, U10HD054241, UG1HD054214, UG1HD069010, UG1HD054241, U24HD069031, UG1HD041267, UG1HD069013)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Keywords
- pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse recurrence, genital hiatus, POP-Q, perineal body, vaginal length, surgical failure, sexual function, postoperative evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Postoperative Complications, Prognosis, Recurrence, Severity of Illness Index, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Pelvic Floor, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Risk Adjustment, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Symptom Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review