The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary Dysmenorrhea: Diagnosis and Therapy
Open accessAbstract
Primary dysmenorrhea is defined as pain during the menstrual cycle in the absence of an identifiable cause. It is one of the most common causes of pelvic pain in women. Dysmenorrhea can negatively affect a woman's quality of life and interfere with daily activities. The pathophysiology of primary dysmenorrhea is likely a result of the cyclooxygenase pathway producing increased prostanoids, particularly prostaglandins (PGs). The increased PGs cause uterine contractions that restrict blood flow and lead to the production of anaerobic metabolites that stimulate pain receptors. Women with a history typical for primary dysmenorrhea can initiate empiric treatment without additional testing. Shared decision making is key to effective management of dysmenorrhea to maximize patient compliance and satisfaction. After a discussion of their risks and benefits, extremely effective empiric therapies are nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and contraceptive hormonal therapy. Other treatments for primary dysmenorrhea can be employed solely or in combination with other modalities, but the literature supporting their use is not as convincing. The physician should initiate an evaluation for secondary dysmenorrhea if the patient does not report improved symptomatology after being compliant with their medical regimen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3699.971 · Cited by 11,090
Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1996) · Pain Forum · doi:10.1016/s1082-3174(96)80062-6 · Cited by 2,784
U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016
Curtis, K. M., Tepper, N. K., Jatlaoui, T. C., Berry-Bibee, E., Horton, L. G., Zapata, L. B., Simmons, K. B., Pagano, H. P., Jamieson, D. J., & Whiteman, M. K. (2016) · MMWR. Recommendations and Reports · doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1 · Cited by 1,456 · cited 1×
“79 Even for patients desiring contraception, other considerations may lead them to decline hormonal contraception for dysmenorrhea.”
BackgroundMedical-eligibility criteria for contraceptive use
Guillebaud, J. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04615-8 · Cited by 1,095
What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review
Iacovides, S., Avidon, I., & Baker, F. C. (2015) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv039 · Cited by 1,022
The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Dysmenorrhea
Ju, H., Jones, M., & Mishra, G. (2014) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxt009 · Cited by 835
Primary Dysmenorrhea: Advances in Pathogenesis and Management
Dawood, M. Y. (2006) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000230214.26638.0c · Cited by 690
Lidegaard, O., Nielsen, L. H., Skovlund, C. W., Skjeldestad, F. E., & Lokkegaard, E. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d6423 · Cited by 608
Diagnosis and management of dysmenorrhoea
Proctor, M., & Farquhar, C. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7550.1134 · Cited by 505
Dinger, J. C., Heinemann, L. A. J., & Kühl-Habich, D. (2007) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.019 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferries-Rowe, E., Corey, E., & Archer, J. S.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2020-10-06
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1047-1058
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3092128223
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 21.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary Dysmenorrhea: Diagnosis and Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0000000000004096
- The paper
- Ferries-Rowe, E., Corey, E., & Archer, J. S. (2020). Primary Dysmenorrhea: Diagnosis and Therapy. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004096
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.