The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of Uterine Leiomyomas in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: An Ultrasound-Screening Study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of pregnant women with one or more leiomyomas detected by research-quality ultrasound screening in the first trimester, to describe the size and location of leiomyomas identified, and to report variation in prevalence by race/ethnicity. METHODS: Within an ongoing prospective cohort, we conducted 4,271 first-trimester or postmiscarriage ultrasound examinations. Sonographers measured each leiomyoma three separate times, recording the maximum diameter in three perpendicular planes each time. Sonographers and investigators classified type and location. RESULTS: Among 458 women with one or more leiomyomas (prevalence 10.7%), we identified a total of 687 leiomyomas. The mean size of the largest leiomyoma was 2.3 cm (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-2.8). Mean gestational age at ultrasonography was 61+/-13 days from last menstrual period. Prevalence varied by race/ethnicity: 18% in African-American women (95% CI 13-25), 8% in white women (95% CI 7-11), and 10% in Hispanic women (95% CI 5-19). The proportion of women with leiomyomas increased with age much more steeply for African-American women than for white women. CONCLUSION: Leiomyomas are common in pregnancy and occur more often among African-American women. Given the limited research on effects of leiomyomas on reproductive outcomes, the degree to which race/ethnic disparities in prevalence of leiomyomas may contribute to disparities in events such as miscarriage and preterm birth warrants investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Cited by
Zimmermann, A., Bernuit, D., Gerlinger, C., Schaefers, M., & Geppert, K. (2012) · BMC Women's Health · doi:10.1186/1472-6874-12-6 · Cited by 556
Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Uterine Fibroids
Pavone, D., Clemenza, S., Sorbi, F., Fambrini, M., & Petraglia, F. (2018) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.004 · Cited by 365
Saravelos, S. H., Yan, J., Rehmani, H., & Li, T.-C. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der293 · Cited by 98
Leiomyomas in Pregnancy and Spontaneous Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Sundermann, A. C., Velez Edwards, D. R., Bray, M. J., Jones, S. H., Latham, S. M., & Hartmann, K. E. (2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002313 · Cited by 58
Self-citationProspective Cohort Study of Uterine Fibroids and Miscarriage Risk
Hartmann, K. E., Velez Edwards, D. R., Savitz, D. A., Jonsson-Funk, M. L., Wu, P., Sundermann, A. C., & Baird, D. D. (2017) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwx062 · Cited by 51
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Laughlin, S. K., Baird, D. D., Savitz, D. A., Herring, A. H., & Hartmann, K. E.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 630-635
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998671501
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Uterine Leiomyomas in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: An Ultrasound-Screening Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0b013e318197bbaf
- The paper
- Laughlin, S. K., Baird, D. D., Savitz, D. A., Herring, A. H., & Hartmann, K. E. (2009). Prevalence of Uterine Leiomyomas in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: An Ultrasound-Screening Study. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318197bbaf
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.