Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 695

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

American Burn Association Consensus Conference to Define Sepsis and Infection in Burns

Greenhalgh, David G., Saffle, Jeffrey R., Holmes, James H., Gamelli, Richard L., Palmieri, Tina L., Horton, Jureta W., Tompkins, Ronald G., Traber, Daniel L., Mozingo, David W., Deitch, Edwin A., Goodwin, Cleon W., Herndon, David N., Gallagher, James J., Sanford, Art P., Jeng, James C., Ahrenholz, David H., Neely, Alice N., OʼMara, Michael S., Wolf, Steven E., Purdue, Gary F., Garner, Warren L., Yowler, Charles J., Latenser, Barbara A.·2007·Journal of Burn Care & Research

Abstract

Because of their extensive wounds, burn patients are chronically exposed to inflammatory mediators. Thus, burn patients, by definition, already have "systemic inflammatory response syndrome." Current definitions for sepsis and infection have many criteria (fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, leukocytosis) that are routinely found in patients with extensive burns, making these current definitions less applicable to the burn population. Experts in burn care and research, all members of the American Burn Association, were asked to review the literature and prepare a potential definition on one topic related to sepsis or infection in burn patients. On January 20, 2007, the participants met in Tucson, Arizona to develop consensus for these definitions. After review of the definitions, a summary of the proceedings was prepared. The goal of the consensus conference was to develop and publish standardized definitions for sepsis and infection-related diagnoses in the burn population. Standardized definitions will improve the capability of performing more meaningful multicenter trials among burn centers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/bcr.0b013e3181599bc9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 695

Metadata

Authors
Greenhalgh, D. G., Saffle, J. R., Holmes, J. H., Gamelli, R. L., Palmieri, T. L., Horton, J. W., Tompkins, R. G., Traber, D. L., Mozingo, D. W., Deitch, E. A., Goodwin, C. W., Herndon, D. N., Gallagher, J. J., Sanford, A. P., Jeng, J. C., Ahrenholz, D. H., Neely, A. N., OʼMara, M. S., Wolf, S. E., Purdue, G. F., Garner, W. L., Yowler, C. J., & Latenser, B. A.
Venue
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2007-11
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
776-790
ISSN
1559-047X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071828147
Cited by
695
References
2
FWCI
12.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Burn Association Consensus Conference to Define Sepsis and Infection in Burns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/bcr.0b013e3181599bc9
The paper
Greenhalgh, D. G., Saffle, J. R., Holmes, J. H., Gamelli, R. L., Palmieri, T. L., Horton, J. W., Tompkins, R. G., Traber, D. L., Mozingo, D. W., Deitch, E. A., Goodwin, C. W., Herndon, D. N., Gallagher, J. J., Sanford, A. P., Jeng, J. C., Ahrenholz, D. H., Neely, A. N., OʼMara, M. S., Wolf, S. E., . . . Latenser, B. A. (2007). American Burn Association Consensus Conference to Define Sepsis and Infection in Burns. Journal of Burn Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/bcr.0b013e3181599bc9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.