Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

American Burn Association Practice Guidelines Burn Shock Resuscitation

Pham, Tam N., Cancio, Leopoldo C., Gibran, Nicole S.·2008·Journal of Burn Care & Research

Abstract

Abstract : There are insufficient data to support a treatment standard treatment at this time. Guidelines - Adults and children with burns greater than 20% TBSA should undergo formal fluid resuscitation using estimates based on body size and surface area burned. - Common formulas used to initiate of resuscitation estimate a crystalloid need for 2 to 4 ml/kg body weight/%TBSA during the first 24 hours. - Fluid resuscitation,regardless of solution type or estimated need, should be titrated to maintain a urine output of approximately 0.5 1.0 ml/ kg/hr in adults and 1.0 1.5 ml/kg/hr in children. - Maintenance fluids should be administered to children in addition to their calculated fluid requirements caused by injury. - Increased volume requirements can be anticipated in patients with full-thickness injuries, inhalation injury, and a delay in resuscitation. Options - The addition of colloid-containing fluid following burn injury, especially after the first 12 to 24 hours postburn, may decrease overall fluid requirements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/bcr.0b013e31815f3876

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Pham, T. N., Cancio, L. C., & Gibran, N. S.
Venue
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2008-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
257-266
ISSN
1559-047X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170575796
Cited by
424
References
1
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.