Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infection: Current Concepts and Recommendations

Open access
Govaert, Geertje A. M., Kuehl, Richard, Atkins, Bridget L., Trampuz, Andrej, Morgenstern, Mario, Obremskey, William T., Verhofstad, Michael H. J., McNally, Martin A., Metsemakers, Willem-Jan, on behalf of the Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) Consensus Group·2020·Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Abstract

Summary: Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe complication after bone injury and can pose a serious diagnostic challenge. Overall, there is a limited amount of scientific evidence regarding diagnostic criteria for FRI. For this reason, the AO Foundation and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society proposed a consensus definition for FRI to standardize the diagnostic criteria and improve the quality of patient care and applicability of future studies regarding this condition. The aim of this article was to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for the diagnosis of FRI. For this purpose, the FRI consensus definition will be discussed together with a proposal for an update based on the available evidence relating to the diagnostic value of clinical parameters, serum inflammatory markers, imaging modalities, tissue and sonication fluid sampling, molecular biology techniques, and histopathological examination. Second, recommendations on microbiology specimen sampling and laboratory operating procedures relevant to FRI will be provided. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/bot.0000000000001614

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Govaert, G. A. M., Kuehl, R., Atkins, B. L., Trampuz, A., Morgenstern, M., Obremskey, W. T., Verhofstad, M. H. J., McNally, M. A., Metsemakers, W.-J., & on behalf of the Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) Consensus Group
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Published
2020-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
8-17
ISSN
0890-5339 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969300673
Cited by
371
References
28
FWCI
27.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infection: Current Concepts and Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/bot.0000000000001614
The paper
Govaert, G. A. M., Kuehl, R., Atkins, B. L., Trampuz, A., Morgenstern, M., Obremskey, W. T., Verhofstad, M. H. J., McNally, M. A., Metsemakers, W.-J., & on behalf of the Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) Consensus Group. (2020). Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infection: Current Concepts and Recommendations. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001614

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.