Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Metabolic and Endocrine Abnormalities in Patients With Nonunions

Brinker, Mark R, O'Connor, Daniel P, Monla, Yomna T, Earthman, Thomas P·2007·Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients with unexplained nonunions, patients with a history of multiple low-energy fractures with at least one progressing to a nonunion, and patients with a nonunion of a nondisplaced pubic rami or sacral ala fracture would have an underlying metabolic or endocrine abnormality that had not been previously diagnosed. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: From a larger series of 683 consecutive patients with nonunion seen by us between January 1998 and December 2005, 37 patients were referred to 1 of 2 clinically practicing endocrinologists to undergo an evaluation for metabolic and endocrine abnormalities. The screening criteria were: 1) an unexplained nonunion that occurred despite adequate reduction and stabilization (and debridement in initially infected cases) without obvious technical error and without any other obvious etiology; 2) a history of multiple low-energy fractures with at least one progressing to a nonunion; or 3) a nonunion of a nondisplaced pubic rami or sacral ala fracture. RESULTS: In all, 31 of the 37 patients (83.8%, 95% CI: 71.3% to 93.8%) who met our screening criteria had one or more new diagnoses of metabolic or endocrine abnormalities. The most common newly diagnosed abnormality was vitamin D deficiency (25 of 37 patients; 68%). Other newly diagnosed abnormalities included calcium imbalances, central hypogonadism, thyroid disorders, and parathyroid hormone disorders. All newly diagnosed abnormalities were treated medically. Eight patients who underwent no operative intervention following the diagnosis and treatment of a new metabolic or endocrine abnormality achieved bony union in an average of 7.6 months (range, 3 to 12 months) following their first visit to the endocrinologist. CONCLUSIONS: Although our study does not prove a causal link between metabolic and endocrine abnormalities and either the development or healing of nonunions, 84% of the patients who met our screening criteria were found to have metabolic or endocrine abnormalities, and eight of our patients achieved bony union following medical treatment alone. All patients with nonunion who meet our screening criteria should be referred to an endocrinologist for evaluation because they are likely to have undiagnosed metabolic or endocrine abnormalities that may be interfering with bone healing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/bot.0b013e31814d4dc6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Brinker, M. R., O'Connor, D. P., Monla, Y. T., & Earthman, T. P.
Venue
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Published
2007-09
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
557-570
ISSN
0890-5339 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085747557
Cited by
312
References
0
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.