Access to Care for Children With Fractures
Abstract
Background Earlier studies have found that children with fractures and PPO insurance have no access problems to orthopaedic care, but children with Medicaid have problems with access to orthopaedic care. Methods Fifty randomly selected orthopaedic offices in each of the 2 counties served by a children's hospital were telephoned to seek an appointment for a fictitious 10-year-old boy with a forearm fracture. Each office was called twice, 1 time reporting that the child had PPO insurance and 1 time that he was having Medicaid. In the second arm of the study, data including insurance status were prospectively collected on all patients with fractures seen in the emergency department of children's hospital. Results Of the 100 offices telephoned, 8 offices gave an appointment within 1 week to the child with Medicaid insurance. Thirty-six of the 100 offices gave an appointment within 1 week to the child with PPO insurance. For the 2210 pediatric fractures seen in the emergency department, the payer mix for patients presenting initially to our facility (1326 patients) was 41% Medicaid, 9% selfpay, and 50% commercial. For the patients presenting to our emergency department after being seen at an outside facility first (884 patients), the payer mix was 47% Medicaid, 13% self-pay, and 40% commercial. The percentages between these two groups were similar but did have a statistically significant difference (P=0.021). Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that r…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children covered by Medicaid-CHIP are less likely to receive specialty care than children covered by commercial insurance.
“However, evidence suggests that the 37 million children covered by Medicaid-CHIP 4,5 are less likely to receive specialty care than children covered by commercial insurance.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]”
From Auditing Access to Specialty Care for Children with Public Insurance (2011) · cites this paper as [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Auditing Access to Specialty Care for Children with Public Insurance
Bisgaier, J., & Rhodes, K. V. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1013285 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
- Authors
- Iobst, C., King, W., Baitner, A., Tidwell, M., Swirsky, S., & Skaggs, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Miami Children's Hospital (US)
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Iobst, Christopher
- King, Wesley
- Baitner, Avi
- Tidwell, Michael
- Swirsky, Stephen
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 244-247
- ISSN
- 0271-6798 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008266621
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- access to orthopaedic care, pediatric fractures, Medicaid, insurance status, payer mix, emergency department referral, children's hospitals, health care disparities
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Emergency Service, Hospital, Health Services Accessibility, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Medicaid, Preferred Provider Organizations, Prospective Studies, United States, Insurance Coverage, Orthopedic Procedures, Fractures, Bone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review