Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Novel Classification System for Spinal Instability in Neoplastic Disease: An Evidence-Based Approach and Expert Consensus From the Spine Oncology Study Group

Fisher, Charles G., DiPaola, Christian P., Ryken, Timothy C., Bilsky, Mark H., Shaffrey, Christopher I., Berven, Sigurd H., Harrop, James S., Fehlings, Michael G., Boriani, Stefano, Chou, Dean, Schmidt, Meic H., Polly, David W., Biagini, Roberto, Burch, Shane, Dekutoski, Mark B., Ganju, Aruna, Gerszten, Peter C., Gokaslan, Ziya L., Groff, Michael W., Liebsch, Norbert J., Mendel, Ehud, Okuno, Scott H., Patel, Shreyaskumar, Rhines, Laurence D., Rose, Peter S., Sciubba, Daniel M., Sundaresan, Narayan, Tomita, Katsuro, Varga, Peter P., Vialle, Luiz R., Vrionis, Frank D., Yamada, Yoshiya, Fourney, Daryl R.·2010·Spine

Abstract

In Brief Study Design. Systematic review and modified Delphi technique. Objective. To use an evidence-based medicine process using the best available literature and expert opinion consensus to develop a comprehensive classification system to diagnose neoplastic spinal instability. Summary of Background Data. Spinal instability is poorly defined in the literature and presently there is a lack of guidelines available to aid in defining the degree of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease. The concept of spinal instability remains important in the clinical decision-making process for patients with spine tumors. Methods. We have integrated the evidence provided by systematic reviews through a modified Delphi technique to generate a consensus of best evidence and expert opinion to develop a classification system to define neoplastic spinal instability. Results. A comprehensive classification system based on patient symptoms and radiographic criteria of the spine was developed to aid in predicting spine stability of neoplastic lesions. The classification system includes global spinal location of the tumor, type and presence of pain, bone lesion quality, spinal alignment, extent of vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral spinal element involvement. Qualitative scores were assigned based on relative importance of particular factors gleaned from the literature and refined by expert consensus. Conclusion. The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score is a comprehensive classification system with content validity that can guide clinicians in identifying when patients with neoplastic disease of the spine may benefit from surgical consultation. It can also aid surgeons in assessing the key components of spinal instability due to neoplasia and may become a prognostic tool for surgical decision-making when put in context with other key elements such as neurologic symptoms, extent of disease, prognosis, patient health factors, oncologic subtype, and radiosensitivity of the tumor. Spinal instability is poorly defined especially in neoplastic disease. The SOSG has developed a comprehensive classification system to define neoplastic spinal instability (the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score). The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score will aid oncologists and primary care physicians in determining timing of referral to spine surgeons and will aid surgeons in assessing need for surgical stabilization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181e16ae2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,272

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, C. G., DiPaola, C. P., Ryken, T. C., Bilsky, M. H., Shaffrey, C. I., Berven, S. H., Harrop, J. S., Fehlings, M. G., Boriani, S., Chou, D., Schmidt, M. H., Polly, D. W., Biagini, R., Burch, S., Dekutoski, M. B., Ganju, A., Gerszten, P. C., Gokaslan, Z. L., Groff, M. W., Liebsch, N. J., Mendel, E., Okuno, S. H., Patel, S., Rhines, L. D., Rose, P. S., Sciubba, D. M., Sundaresan, N., Tomita, K., Varga, P. P., Vialle, L. R., Vrionis, F. D., Yamada, Y., & Fourney, D. R.
Venue
Spine
Published
2010-10
Volume
35
Issue
22
Pages
E1221-E1229
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2252887828
Cited by
1,272
References
1
FWCI
18.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel Classification System for Spinal Instability in Neoplastic Disease: An Evidence-Based Approach and Expert Consensus From the Spine Oncology Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181e16ae2
The paper
Fisher, C. G., DiPaola, C. P., Ryken, T. C., Bilsky, M. H., Shaffrey, C. I., Berven, S. H., Harrop, J. S., Fehlings, M. G., Boriani, S., Chou, D., Schmidt, M. H., Polly, D. W., Biagini, R., Burch, S., Dekutoski, M. B., Ganju, A., Gerszten, P. C., Gokaslan, Z. L., Groff, M. W., . . . Fourney, D. R. (2010). A Novel Classification System for Spinal Instability in Neoplastic Disease: An Evidence-Based Approach and Expert Consensus From the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181e16ae2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.