CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,041Spine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008

Open access
Rajaee, Sean S., Bae, Hyun W., Kanim, Linda E.A., Delamarter, Rick B.·2012·Spine
DOI 10.1097/brs.0b013e31820cccfb
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Epidemiological study using national administrative data. OBJECTIVE: To provide a complete analysis of national trends in spinal fusion from 1998 to 2008 and compare with trends in laminectomy, hip replacement, knee arthroplasty, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass graft. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have reported a rapid increase in volume of spinal fusions in the United States prior to 2001, but limited reports exist beyond this point, analyzing all spinal fusion procedures collectively. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample for the years 1998 to 2008. Discharges were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes for the following procedures: spinal fusion, laminectomy, hip replacement, knee arthroplasty, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass graft. Population-based utilization rates were calculated from the US census data. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2008, the annual number of spinal fusion discharges increased 2.4-fold (137%) from 174,223 to 413,171 (P < 0.001). In contrast, during the same time period, laminectomy, hip replacement, knee arthroplasty, and percutaneous coronary angioplasty yielded relative increases of only 11.3%, 49.1%, 126.8%, and 38.8% in discharges, while coronary artery bypass graft experienced a decrease of 40.1%. Between 1998 and 2008, mean age for spinal fusion increased from 48.8 to 54.2 years (P < 0.001), in-hospital mortality rate decreased from 0.29% to 0.25% (P < 0.01), and mean total hospital charges associated with spinal fusion increased 3.3-fold (P < 0.001). The national bill for spinal fusion increased 7.9-fold (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Frequency, utilization, and hospital charges of spinal fusion have increased at a higher rate than other notable inpatient procedures, as seen in this study from 1998 to 2008. In addition, patient demographics and hospital characteristics changed significantly; in particular, whereas the average age for spinal fusion increased, the in-hospital mortality rate decreased.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/brs.0b013e31820cccfb

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Angevine, 2003, Spine (Phila Pa 1), 28, 931

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rajaee, S. S., Bae, H. W., Kanim, L. E. A., & Delamarter, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rajaee, Sean S.
  • Bae, Hyun W.
  • Kanim, Linda E.A.
  • Delamarter, Rick B.
ORCID
Venue
Spine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2012-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
67-76
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/brs.0b013e31820cccfb
OpenAlex
W1994568570
Cited by
1,041
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 17
FWCI
24.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Keywords
spinal fusion, surgical utilization trends, laminectomy, total hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, hospital charges, in-hospital mortality, patient age, hospital characteristics, health care costs, National Inpatient Sample, administrative claims data
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Coronary Artery Bypass, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Laminectomy, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Spinal Diseases, Spinal Fusion, United States, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Survival Rate, Hospital Mortality, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review