Cited by 63Organ Donation and TransplantationCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Vital Signs After Cardiac Arrest Following Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study*

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Controversies regarding the process and timing of the determination of death for controlled organ donation after circulatory death persist. This study assessed the feasibility of conducting a prospective, observational study of continuous monitoring of vital signs for 30 minutes after the clinical determination of death in five Canadian ICUs. Waveform data were analyzed. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: One pediatric and four adult Canadian ICUs. PATIENTS: One month of age or older, admitted to the ICU, and for whom a consensual decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapies had been made, with an anticipation of imminent death. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Invasive arterial blood pressure, electrocardiogram, and oxygen saturation plethysmography activity were recorded and reviewed for 30 minutes after declaration of death. Feasibility was assessed (recruitment, consent rate, protocol compliance, and staff satisfaction). Of 188 subjects screened over 16 months, 41 subjects were enrolled (87% consent rate). Data collection was complete for 30 subjects (73% protocol compliance). In four subjects, arterial blood pressure resumed following cessation of activity. The longest period of cessation of arterial blood pressure before resumption was 89 seconds. The duration of resumed activity ranged from 1 to 172 seconds. No cases of sustained resumption of arterial blood pressure activity were recorded, and no instances of clinical autoresuscitation were reported. In nearly all patients (27 of 30), electrocardiogram activity continued after the disappearance of arterial blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first observational study to prospectively collect waveform data for 30 minutes after the declaration of death. A future larger study may support initial data suggesting that circulatory function does not resume after more than 89 seconds of absence. Furthermore, persistence of cardiac electrical activity with the documented absence of circulation may not be relevant to declaration of death.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000417

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Hernadez-Alejandro, 2011, Can J Anaesth, 58, 599, 10.1007/s12630-011-9511-9 · DOI
  2. Moser, 2012, Can Urol Assoc J, 6, 448, 10.5489/cuaj.114 · DOI
  3. Halpern, 2010, JAMA, 304, 2592, 10.1001/jama.2010.1824 · DOI
  4. Bastami, 2013, Crit Care Med, 41, 897, 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827585fe · DOI
  5. Wijdicks, 2004, Neurology, 62, 673, 10.1212/WNL.62.4.673 · DOI
  6. Robertson, 1999, Hastings Cent Rep, 29, 6, 10.2307/3527865 · DOI
  7. Nakagawa, 2011, Pediatr Crit Care Med, 12, 375, 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820ac30c · DOI
  8. Dhanani, 2012, J Intensive Care Med, 27, 238, 10.1177/0885066610396993 · DOI
  9. Dhanani, 2012, Crit Care Med, 40, 1449, 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823e9898 · DOI
  10. Hornby, 2010, Crit Care Med, 38, 1246, 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8caaa · DOI
  11. Burns, 2008, CMAJ, 179, 245, 10.1503/cmaj.080372 · DOI
  12. DeVita, 2000, Crit Care Med, 28, 1709, 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00002 · DOI
  13. Sheth, 2012, Crit Care Med, 40, 158, 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0b2a · DOI
  14. Kovach, 1976, Annu Rev Physiol, 38, 571, 10.1146/annurev.ph.38.030176.003035 · DOI
  15. Menon, 2012, Intensive Care Med, 38, 153, 10.1007/s00134-011-2412-0 · DOI
  16. Smith, 2013, J Crit Care, 28, 28, 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dhanani, S., Hornby, L., Ward, R., Baker, A., Dodek, P., Chamber-Evans, J., Fowler, R., Friedrich, J. O., Gow, R. M., Kutsogiannis, D. J., Mcintyre, L., Momoli, F., Morin, K., Ramsay, T., Scales, D., Writer, H., Yildirim, S., Young, B., & Shemie, S.
Affiliations
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2014-11
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
2358-2369
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992015703
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
declaration of death, circulatory death, donation after circulatory death, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, vital signs, arterial blood pressure, electrocardiogram, autoresuscitation, cardiac arrest
MeSH terms
Adult, Canada, Child, Child, Preschool, Death, Feasibility Studies, Female, Heart Arrest, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Male, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Quality Control, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Withholding Treatment, Vital Signs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review