Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Management of the Potential Organ Donor in the ICU: Society of Critical Care Medicine/American College of Chest Physicians/Association of Organ Procurement Organizations Consensus Statement

Kotloff, Robert M., Blosser, Sandralee, Fulda, Gerard J., Malinoski, Darren, Ahya, Vivek N., Angel, Luis, Byrnes, Matthew C., DeVita, Michael A., Grissom, Thomas E., Halpern, Scott D., Nakagawa, Thomas A., Stock, Peter G., Sudan, Debra L., Wood, Kenneth E., Anillo, Sergio J., Bleck, Thomas P., Eidbo, Elling E., Fowler, Richard A., Glazier, Alexandra K., Gries, Cynthia, Hasz, Richard, Herr, Dan, Khan, Akhtar, Landsberg, David, Lebovitz, Daniel J., Levine, Deborah Jo, Mathur, Mudit, Naik, Priyumvada, Niemann, Claus U., Nunley, David R., O’Connor, Kevin J., Pelletier, Shawn J., Rahman, Omar, Ranjan, Dinesh, Salim, Ali, Sawyer, Robert G., Shafer, Teresa, Sonneti, David, Spiro, Peter, Valapour, Maryam, Vikraman-Sushama, Deepak, Whelan, Timothy P. M.·2015·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

This document was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the Association of Organ Procurement Organizations. Under the auspices of these societies, a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional task force was convened, incorporating expertise in critical care medicine, organ donor management, and transplantation. Members of the task force were divided into 13 subcommittees, each focused on one of the following general or organ-specific areas: death determination using neurologic criteria, donation after circulatory death determination, authorization process, general contraindications to donation, hemodynamic management, endocrine dysfunction and hormone replacement therapy, pediatric donor management, cardiac donation, lung donation, liver donation, kidney donation, small bowel donation, and pancreas donation. Subcommittees were charged with generating a series of management-related questions related to their topic. For each question, subcommittees provided a summary of relevant literature and specific recommendations. The specific recommendations were approved by all members of the task force and then assembled into a complete document. Because the available literature was overwhelmingly comprised of observational studies and case series, representing low-quality evidence, a decision was made that the document would assume the form of a consensus statement rather than a formally graded guideline. The goal of this document is to provide critical care practitioners with essential information and practical recommendations related to management of the potential organ donor, based on the available literature and expert consensus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000958

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kotloff, R. M., Blosser, S., Fulda, G. J., Malinoski, D., Ahya, V. N., Angel, L., Byrnes, M. C., DeVita, M. A., Grissom, T. E., Halpern, S. D., Nakagawa, T. A., Stock, P. G., Sudan, D. L., Wood, K. E., Anillo, S. J., Bleck, T. P., Eidbo, E. E., Fowler, R. A., Glazier, A. K., Gries, C., Hasz, R., Herr, D., Khan, A., Landsberg, D., Lebovitz, D. J., Levine, D. J., Mathur, M., Naik, P., Niemann, C. U., Nunley, D. R., O’Connor, K. J., Pelletier, S. J., Rahman, O., Ranjan, D., Salim, A., Sawyer, R. G., Shafer, T., Sonneti, D., Spiro, P., Valapour, M., Vikraman-Sushama, D., & Whelan, T. P. M.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2015-06
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
1291-1325
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2229998871
Cited by
376
References
4
FWCI
35.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.