Epidemiology, Resistance Profiles, and Outcomes of Bloodstream Infections in Community-Onset Sepsis in the United States*
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe frequency of positive blood cultures, patterns of pathogens’ characteristics and their resistance profile in patients with blood cultures drawn due to a presumed diagnosis of community-onset sepsis, and to examine the association between blood culture-positive pathogens and hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two hundred one U.S. hospitals from 2016 to 2020 using the Premier Healthcare Database. SUBJECTS: Adult patients presenting with community-onset sepsis who had blood cultures collected within 2 days of hospital admission. We defined sepsis using the U.S. Centers for Disease Control Adult Sepsis Event Surveillance criteria. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 147,061 patients with community-onset sepsis. The number of blood culture-positive sepsis episodes was 21,167 (14%) and the number of nonblood culture-positive sepsis episodes was 20,326 (14%). Among patients with blood culture-positive sepsis, Gram-negative rods were isolated in 55% of patients, Gram-positive cocci were isolated in 47%. Of those, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was 11%, ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales /extended-spectrum β-lactamase was 7%, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales was 1.3%. The crude in-hospital mortality was 17% for culture-negative sepsis, 13% for nonblood culture-positive sepsis, and 17% for blood culture-positive sepsis. In multilevel logistic regression models, compared with culture-negative sepsis, blood culture-positive sepsis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85–0.94) and nonblood culture-positive sepsis (aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.78–0.87) were associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality. Acinetobacter species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus , and MRSA were associated with higher in-hospital mortality, whereas Escherichia coli , Klebsiella species, Proteus species, and Streptococcus species were associated with lower in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized with community-onset sepsis, the prevalence of blood culture-positive sepsis was 14%. Among positive blood culture sepsis resistant organisms were infrequent. Compared with culture-negative sepsis, blood culture-positive sepsis and nonblood culture-positive sepsis were associated with lower in-hospital mortality.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MRSA and ceftriaxone-resistant gram-negative organisms constitute a small minority of culture-positive community-onset sepsis cases.
“Others have also documented that MRSA and ceftriaxone-resistant gram-negative organisms constitute a small minority of culture-positive community-onset sepsis cases.”
From Trends in empiric broad-Spectrum antibiotic use for suspected community-onset Sepsis in US hospitals (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Rhee, C., Wang, R., Zhang, Z., Fram, D., Kadri, S. S., & Klompas, M. (2019) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000003817 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trends in empiric broad-Spectrum antibiotic use for suspected community-onset Sepsis in US hospitals
Rhee, C., Chen, T., Kadri, S. S., Lawandi, A., Yek, C., Walker, M., Warner, S., Fram, D., Chen, H.-C., Shappell, C. N., et al. (2024) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18923 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ohnuma, T., Chihara, S., Costin, B., Treggiari, M., Bartz, R. R., Raghunathan, K., & Krishnamoorthy, V.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Virginia Mason Medical Center (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2023-04-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1148-1158
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4379381701
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
- Keywords
- community-onset sepsis, bloodstream infection, blood culture positivity, antimicrobial resistance, Gram-negative bacilli, Gram-positive cocci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, carbapenem resistance, in-hospital mortality, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Infections, Cross Infection, Escherichia coli, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, United States, Cohort Studies, Hospital Mortality, Sepsis, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review