Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Derivation and validation of Spo2/Fio2 ratio to impute for Pao2/Fio2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score*

Open access
Pandharipande, Pratik P., Shintani, Ayumi K., Hagerman, Heather E., St Jacques, Paul J., Rice, Todd W., Sanders, Neal W., Ware, Lorraine B., Bernard, Gordon R., Ely, E Wesley·2009·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is validated to measure severity of organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. However, in some practice settings, daily arterial blood gas data required to calculate the respiratory component of the SOFA score are often unavailable. The objectives of this study were to derive Spo2/Fio2 (SF) ratio correlations with the Pao2/Fio2 (PF) ratio to calculate the respiratory parameter of the SOFA score, and to validate the respiratory SOFA obtained using SF ratios against clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We obtained matched measurements of Spo2 and Pao2 from two populations: group 1-patients undergoing general anesthesia and group 2-patients from the acute respiratory distress syndrome network-low-vs. high-tidal volume for the acute respiratory management of acute respiratory distress syndrome database. Using a linear regression model, we first determined SF ratios corresponding to PF ratios of 100, 200, 300, and 400. Second, we evaluated the contribution of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the relationship between SF and PF, for patients on PEEP in centimeters of water (cm H2O) of <8, 8-12, and >12. Third, we calculated the SOFA scores in a separate cohort of intensive care unit patients using the derived SF ratios and validated them against clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The total SOFA scores calculated using SF ratios and PF ratios were highly correlated (Spearman's rho 0.85, p < 0.001) in all patients and in the three stratified PEEP categories (<8 cm H2O, Spearman's rho 0.87, p < 0.001; PEEP 8-12 cm H20, Spearman's rho 0.85, p < 0.001; PEEP >12 cm H2O, Spearman's rho 0.85, p < 0.001). The respiratory SOFA scores based on SF ratios and PF ratios correlated similarly with intensive care unit length of stay and ventilator-free days, when validated in a cohort of critically ill patients. CONCLUSION: The total and respiratory SOFA scores obtained with imputed SF values correlate with the corresponding SOFA score using PF ratios. Both the derived and original respiratory SOFA scores similarly predict outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819cefa9

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Pandharipande, P. P., Shintani, A. K., Hagerman, H. E., St Jacques, P. J., Rice, T. W., Sanders, N. W., Ware, L. B., Bernard, G. R., & Ely, E. W.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-04
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
1317-1321
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141213079
Cited by
309
References
10
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Derivation and validation of Spo2/Fio2 ratio to impute for Pao2/Fio2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819cefa9
The paper
Pandharipande, P. P., Shintani, A. K., Hagerman, H. E., St Jacques, P. J., Rice, T. W., Sanders, N. W., Ware, L. B., Bernard, G. R., & Ely, E. W. (2009). Derivation and validation of Spo2/Fio2 ratio to impute for Pao2/Fio2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819cefa9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.