The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Derivation and validation of Spo2/Fio2 ratio to impute for Pao2/Fio2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score*
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is validated to measure severity of organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. However, in some practice settings, daily arterial blood gas data required to calculate the respiratory component of the SOFA score are often unavailable. The objectives of this study were to derive Spo2/Fio2 (SF) ratio correlations with the Pao2/Fio2 (PF) ratio to calculate the respiratory parameter of the SOFA score, and to validate the respiratory SOFA obtained using SF ratios against clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: We obtained matched measurements of Spo2 and Pao2 from two populations: group 1-patients undergoing general anesthesia and group 2-patients from the acute respiratory distress syndrome network-low-vs. high-tidal volume for the acute respiratory management of acute respiratory distress syndrome database. Using a linear regression model, we first determined SF ratios corresponding to PF ratios of 100, 200, 300, and 400. Second, we evaluated the contribution of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the relationship between SF and PF, for patients on PEEP in centimeters of water (cm H2O) of <8, 8-12, and >12. Third, we calculated the SOFA scores in a separate cohort of intensive care unit patients using the derived SF ratios and validated them against clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The total SOFA scores calculated using SF ratios and PF ratios were highly correlated (Spearman's rho 0.85, p < 0.001) in all patients and in the three stratified PEEP categories (<8 cm H2O, Spearman's rho 0.87, p < 0.001; PEEP 8-12 cm H20, Spearman's rho 0.85, p < 0.001; PEEP >12 cm H2O, Spearman's rho 0.85, p < 0.001). The respiratory SOFA scores based on SF ratios and PF ratios correlated similarly with intensive care unit length of stay and ventilator-free days, when validated in a cohort of critically ill patients. CONCLUSION: The total and respiratory SOFA scores obtained with imputed SF values correlate with the corresponding SOFA score using PF ratios. Both the derived and original respiratory SOFA scores similarly predict outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system
KNAUS, W. A., DRAPER, E. A., WAGNER, D. P., & ZIMMERMAN, J. E. (1985) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009 · Cited by 13,664
APACHE II-A Severity of Disease Classification System: Reply
Knaus, W. A., Draper, E. A., Wagner, D. P., & Zimmerman, J. E. (1986) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-198608000-00028 · Cited by 13,376
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421801 · Cited by 12,941
Vincent, J. L., Moreno, R., Takala, J., Willatts, S., De Mendonça, A., Bruining, H., Reinhart, C. K., Suter, P. M., & Thijs, L. G. (1996) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01709751 · Cited by 11,674
APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.
Knaus, W. A., Draper, E. S., Wagner, D. P., & Zimmerman, J. E. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 6,034
Vincent, J.-L., de Mendonca, A., Cantraine, F., Moreno, R., Takala, J., Suter, P. M., Sprung, C. L., Colardyn, F., & Blecher, S. (1998) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016 · Cited by 3,463
Serial Evaluation of the SOFA Score to Predict Outcome in Critically Ill Patients
Ferreira, F. L. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.14.1754 · Cited by 2,862
Rice, T. W., Wheeler, A. P., Bernard, G. R., Hayden, D. L., Schoenfeld, D. A., & Ware, L. B. (2007) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.07-0617 · Cited by 820
Self-citationManagement of the critically ill geriatric patient
Marik, P. E. (2006) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000232624.14883.9a · Cited by 193
SCORING SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING ORGAN DYSFUNCTION AND SURVIVAL
Vincent, J., Ferreira, F., & Moreno, R. P. (2000) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70114-7 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Kochenderfer, J. N., Dudley, M. E., Feldman, S. A., Wilson, W. H., Spaner, D. E., Maric, I., Stetler-Stevenson, M., Phan, G. Q., Hughes, M. S., Sherry, R. M., et al. (2012) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-10-384388 · Cited by 1,440
Riviello, E. D., Kiviri, W., Twagirumugabe, T., Mueller, A., Banner-Goodspeed, V. M., Officer, L., Novack, V., Mutumwinka, M., Talmor, D. S., & Fowler, R. A. (2016) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201503-0584oc · Cited by 447
Time to vasopressor initiation and organ failure progression in early septic shock
Black, L. P., Puskarich, M. A., Smotherman, C., Miller, T., Fernandez, R., & Guirgis, F. W. (2020) · JACEP Open · doi:10.1002/emp2.12060 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandharipande, P. P., Shintani, A. K., Hagerman, H. E., St Jacques, P. J., Rice, T. W., Sanders, N. W., Ware, L. B., Bernard, G. R., & Ely, E. W.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1317-1321
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141213079
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Derivation and validation of Spo2/Fio2 ratio to impute for Pao2/Fio2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819cefa9
- The paper
- Pandharipande, P. P., Shintani, A. K., Hagerman, H. E., St Jacques, P. J., Rice, T. W., Sanders, N. W., Ware, L. B., Bernard, G. R., & Ely, E. W. (2009). Derivation and validation of Spo2/Fio2 ratio to impute for Pao2/Fio2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819cefa9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.