Cited by 177Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAcute Kidney Injury ResearchHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

Association between blood lactate levels, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment subscores, and 28-day mortality during early and late intensive care unit stay: A retrospective observational study*

Jansen, Tim C., van Bommel, Jasper, Woodward, Roger, Mulder, Paul G. H., Bakker, Jan·2009·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate whether the level and duration of increased blood lactate levels are associated with daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and organ subscores and to evaluate these associations during the early and late phases of the intensive care unit stay. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting Mixed intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients 134 heterogeneous intensive care unit patients. Interventions None. Measurements and main results We calculated the area under the lactate curve above 2.0 mmol/L (lactateAUC>2). Daily SOFA scores were collected during the first 28 days of intensive care unit stay to calculate initial (day 1), maximal, total and mean scores. Daily lactateAUC>2 values were related to both daily SOFA scores and organ subscores using mixed-model analysis of variance. This was also done separately during the early ( 2.75 days) phase of the intensive care unit stay.Compared with normolactatemic patients (n = 78), all median SOFA variables were higher in patients with hyperlactatemia (n = 56) (initial SOFA: 9 [interquartile range 4-12] vs. 4 [2-7]; maximal SOFA: 10 [5-13] vs. 5 [2-9]; total SOFA: 28 [10-70] vs. 9 [3-41]; mean SOFA: 7 [4-10] vs. 4 [2-6], all p 2 and daily SOFA was an increase of 0.62 SOFA-points per 1 day.mmol/L of lactateAUC>2 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.81, p 2 and SOFA was 1.01 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.50, p 2. Conclusions Blood lactate levels were strongly related to SOFA scores…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181a0f919

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jansen, T. C., van Bommel, J., Woodward, R., Mulder, P. G. H., & Bakker, J.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-08
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
2369-2374
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133635544
Cited by
177
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
blood lactate, hyperlactatemia, SOFA score, organ failure, 28-day mortality, ICU length of stay, critically ill patients, prognostic factors, mortality prediction, lactate clearance
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, Netherlands, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Survival Analysis, Hospital Mortality, Lactic Acid, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review