The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The microcirculation of septic patients has been characterized only semiquantitatively. Our goal was to characterize the sublingual microcirculation in healthy volunteers and patients with septic shock quantitatively. Our hypotheses were that 1) hyperdynamic blood flow is absent in septic shock; 2) nonsurvivors show more severe alterations than survivors; and 3) quantitative and semiquantitative microcirculatory parameters have a similar performance. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Teaching intensive care unit in a university-affiliated hospital. SUBJECTS: Twenty-five normal volunteers and 25 patients with septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The sublingual microcirculation was evaluated by means of sidestream dark field imaging. Semiquantitative and quantitative microcirculatory parameters were determined through the use of applied software. Septic patients showed decreased perfused capillary density (13.2±4.4 mm/mm² vs. 16.6±1.6 mm/mm²), proportion of perfused capillaries (0.78±0.23 vs. 1.00±0.01), microvascular flow index (2.15±0.61 vs. 2.97±0.03), and red blood cell velocity (830±183 µm/sec vs. 1332±187 µm/sec) along with increased heterogeneity flow index (1.64±1.14 vs. 0.25±0.19) compared with controls. No differences were found in total capillary density (16.9±2.2 vs. 16.7±1.6). Only 4% of capillaries analyzed showed red blood cell velocities>75th percentile of the velocities of the normal volunteers. The nonsurvivors exhibited decreased perfused capillary density, proportion of perfused capillaries, and microvascular flow index along with increased heterogeneity flow index compared with the survivors. The correlations between microvascular flow index and proportion of perfused capillaries, total capillary density and number of grid-crossing capillaries, and red blood cell velocities and microvascular flow index gave high R values (0.92, 0.65, and 0.52, respectively; p<.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The main characteristics of sublingual microcirculation in patients with septic shock are hypoperfusion and increased flow heterogeneity. Hyperdynamic microvascular blood flow was not found. Nonsurvivors showed more severe alterations than survivors. Quantitative and semiquantitative microcirculatory variables displayed similar behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vincent, J. L., Moreno, R., Takala, J., Willatts, S., De Mendonça, A., Bruining, H., Reinhart, C. K., Suter, P. M., & Thijs, L. G. (1996) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf01709751 · Cited by 11,674
Cited by
Cecconi, M., De Backer, D., Antonelli, M., Beale, R., Bakker, J., Hofer, C., Jaeschke, R., Mebazaa, A., Pinsky, M. R., Teboul, J. L., et al. (2014) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z · Cited by 1,767
Endothelial barrier dysfunction in septic shock
Opal, S. M., & van der Poll, T. (2015) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12331 · Cited by 353
Microcirculatory Differences in Children With Congenital Heart Disease According to Cyanosis and Age
González, R., Urbano, J., Solana, M. J., Hervías, M., Pita, A., Pérez, R., Álvarez, R., Teigell, E., Gil-Jaurena, J.-M., Zamorano, J., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2019.00264 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanoore Edul, V. S., Enrico, C., Laviolle, B., Risso Vazquez, A., Ince, C., & Dubin, A.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1443-1448
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033070593
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31823dae59
- The paper
- Kanoore Edul, V. S., Enrico, C., Laviolle, B., Risso Vazquez, A., Ince, C., & Dubin, A. (2012). Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31823dae59
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.