A Manual-Based Intervention to Address Clinical Crises and Retain Patients in the Treatment of Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS)
Abstract
Objective To describe a manual-based intervention to address clinical crises and retain participants in the Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS). Method The use of adjunct services for attrition prevention (ASAP) is described for adolescents (ages 12-17 years) during the 12-week acute treatment in TADS, from 2000 to 2003. Logistic regression, controlling for site, was used to predict use. Results Of 439 enrolled participants, 17.8% (n = 78) used ASAP primarily for suicidality or worsening of depression. Of these, 46.2% continued in their assigned treatment through week 12, 47.4% received out-of-protocol treatment but continued participating in assessments, and 10.3% withdrew consent, including 3 who terminated treatment and withdrew consent on the same date. ASAP use did not differ between treatments (p =.97) and typically occurred early in treatment. At the end of the 12 weeks, 37.2% of participants using ASAP remained in their assigned treatment, although 80.8% continued participating in assessments. ASAP was associated with, at baseline, a higher severity of depression (p Conclusions ASAP may be useful to retain adolescent participants and as a safety intervention in placebo-controlled trials. In clinical practice ASAP-like procedures may be useful to encourage adherence in patients engaging in long-term treatment. Clinical trial registration information-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00006286.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In previous studies with adolescents, drop-out rates in CBT-based research varied from 17% to 31%.
“In previous studies that were carried out with adolescents, drop-out rates in CBT-based research varied from 17% to 31% (May et al., 2007), which resembles the drop-out rates in the CBT psychoeducation program in the current study (30%).”
From Reducing Test Anxiety During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (2024) · cites this paper as May et al., 2007
Cites
The Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS)
MARCH, J., SILVA, S., & VITIELLO, B. (2006) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000237709.35637.c0 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weisz, J. R., Kuppens, S., Ng, M. Y., Eckshtain, D., Ugueto, A. M., Vaughn-Coaxum, R., Jensen-Doss, A., Hawley, K. M., Krumholz Marchette, L. S., Chu, B. C., et al. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0040360 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Using Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Any Treatment
Scott, K., & Lewis, C. C. (2015) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.01.010 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Cox, G. R., Callahan, P., Churchill, R., Hunot, V., Merry, S. N., Parker, A. G., & Hetrick, S. E. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008324.pub2 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Tercyak, K. P., Abraham, A. A., Graham, A. L., Wilson, L. D., & Walker, L. R. (2009) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn085 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Uysal, B., Gormez, V., Karatepe, H. T., Sönmez, D., Taştekne, F., Tepedelen, M. S., & Jordan, T. R. (2024) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941231174394 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In previous studies that were carried out with adolescents, drop-out rates in CBT-based research varied from 17% to 31% (May et al., 2007), which resembles the drop-out rates in the CBT psychoeducation program in the current study (30%).”
BackgroundResult
- Authors
- MAY, D. E., KRATOCHVIL, C. J., PUUMALA, S. E., SILVA, S. G., REZAC, A. J., HALLIN, M. J., REINECKE, M. A., VITIELLO, B., WELLER, E. B., PATHAK, S., SIMONS, A. D., & MARCH, J. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- MAY, DIANE E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 573-581
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081608129
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (n01mh080008-004)
- National Institute of Mental Health (N01 MH 80008)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- treatment retention, suicidality, treatment withdrawal, safety interventions, acute treatment, substance use, precontemplation, Treatment for Adolescents with Depression Study
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Crisis Intervention, Dangerous Behavior, Major Depressive Disorder, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Manuals as Topic, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review